GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 332,570
Threads: 115,730
Posts: 2,208,170
Welcome to our newest member, CharlesGab
» Online Users: 2,185
0 members and 2,185 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 08-03-2010, 12:23 PM
Drolefille Drolefille is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
I don't really see how that makes my status here any less tenuous than anyone else whose ancestors came here legally.
Because it doesn't matter how your ancestors got here. It matters about how you are here.

Quote:
The provisions in Section 1 have been interpreted to the effect that children born on United States soil, with very few exceptions, are U.S. citizens. This type of guarantee—legally termed jus soli, or "right of the territory"— does not exist in most of Europe, Asia or the Middle East, although it is part of English common law and is common in the Americas. The phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" indicates that there are some exceptions to the universal rule that birth on U.S. soil automatically grants citizenship.

Two Supreme Court precedents were set by the cases of Elk v. Wilkins[7] and United States v. Wong Kim Ark.[8] Elk v. Wilkins established that Native American tribes represented independent political powers with no allegiance to the United States, and that their peoples were under a special jurisdiction of the United States. Children born to these Native American tribes therefore did not automatically receive citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment if they voluntarily left their tribe.[9] Indian tribes that paid taxes were exempt from this ruling; their peoples were already citizens by an earlier act of Congress, and all non-citizen Native Americans (called "Indians") were subsequently made citizens by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

In Wong Kim Ark the Supreme Court held that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, a man born within the United States to foreigners (in that case, Chinese citizens) who have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and are carrying on business in the United States[10] and who were not employed in a diplomatic or other official capacity by a foreign power, was a citizen of the United States.

Under these two rulings, the following persons born in the United States are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, and thus do not qualify for automatic citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment:

* Children born to foreign diplomats

* Children born to enemy forces in hostile occupation of the United States

* Children born to Native Americans who are members of tribes not taxed (These were later given full citizenship by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.)

All other persons born in the United States were citizens.
You are of the exact same worth as any other citizen as far as your country is concerned.
__________________
From the SigmaTo the K!
Polyamorous, Pansexual and Proud of it!
It Gets Better
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona governor signs immigration bill DaemonSeid News & Politics 272 06-21-2010 10:38 AM
Rwandans file lawsuit over French complicity in genocide IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 8 02-21-2005 11:01 AM
Overweight teens file fat lawsuit against McDonald's The1calledTKE News & Politics 46 02-03-2005 12:28 PM
Bryant accuser file civil lawsuit moe.ron News & Politics 46 08-16-2004 09:16 PM
Slave Descendants File $1B Lawsuit CrimsonTide4 Delta Sigma Theta 16 04-06-2004 04:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.