Gosh, I LOVE private messages.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle

If you are going to publicly announce you are putting someone on ignore, you probably shouldn't then pm him/her. The point is to IGNORE him/her, not to give them private one on one time, right?

I mean . . . even if we assume you're right, why would you broadcast this so passive-aggressively when everyone knows exactly who/what you're talking about?

This thread makes me want to start cutting myself and posting the photos on myspace. I'd better head to Hot Topic at lunch so I'm properly attired. Jesus Christ.

[agzg]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

I'd better head to Hot Topic at lunch so I'm properly attired.

BAHAHAHAHAHA!

[SWTXBelle]

OH - I thought this was the private message thread. I missed the "this is the non-ambiguous thread" memo. I've posted two general comments about private messages - and I would argue that they are general, not ambiguous, observations about the use of private messages. They are neither of them specific to certain private messages I have received - if you make the assumption that they are you are mistaken. Clear enough?

I really don't want everyone, me included, getting pissy about stupid stuff. So I'm dropping the whole thing - Merry Christmas.

And yes, Hot Topic is funny.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

I mean . . . even if we assume you're right, why would you broadcast this so passive-aggressively when everyone knows exactly who/what you're talking about?

This thread makes me want to start cutting myself and posting the photos on myspace. I'd better head to Hot Topic at lunch so I'm properly attired. Jesus Christ.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by KSigkid

I actually thought you had posted a photo of me asleep at the keyboard for a minute . . . wow.

[SWTXBelle]

There is a great deal of assuming going on - perhaps it is unwarranted.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

[DrPhil]

This isn't a thread for ambiguity.