Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedBeta
Is ULTA breaking this law as a policy, or did their stock person simply do a shitty job and not pull the tag when the sale expired? If it was a mistake, then SoCalGirl's response is entirely unwarranted (though the store should have just obliged). If she can prove there is rampant abuse of the concept of a sale, then that's very different. I'm no lawyer, but fraud (which is what I assume this law was put in place to prevent) - seems to me - requires some sort of intent to deceive.
|
I'm sorry, i don't agree. From what I read, SoCalGirl had an appropriate response. Even if it was a stock person's fault for leaving the sign, the manager should abide by the law and allow the sale. Afterall, like some have said $1.50 shouldn't matter.
It's the principle of the thing. SoCalGirl shouldn't just "give up" or leave it alone because the manager refused to allow the sale.
Threaded Mode
