Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[adpiucf]

I never said any of those things, blueangel. Right or wrong, the fact remains that many Greek Chat members don't like you. Stating such is not a TOS violation or a personal attack, just a point of information. How you choose to conduct yourself on Greek Chat isn't my concern. I was responding to Tom's allegation.

[AGDee]

If anybody has questions about an organization's policies regarding AI (or anything else for that matter.. like if new members can wear letters, have to return letters if they aren't initiated, etc), then they should be referred to their headquarters/officers/volunteers who know the definitive answers. Even if one of those people post on this board, they are less likely to post policy in an open forum like this. Few posters on GC are qualified to give out this information and ensure accuracy.

[Drolefille]

I agree that private information and particularly ritual information should be kept private. However I feel the focus on here is wrong. Someone ASKING about the requirements for AI should be told to contact the GLO, yes. But we shouldn't get mad at the askers. We should get mad at people who tell the private information.

It seems that more AI threads get ruined by active GC members then by crazy PNAIs. (Not that there aren't both) I don't know why sensible modding and some discretion on the part of the sorority members couldn't solve most of the AI problems. And as for the crazies, their lack discretion will directly affect their AI process. Thus letting that particular problem solve itself.

[AGDee]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

I agree that private information and particularly ritual information should be kept private. However I feel the focus on here is wrong. Someone ASKING about the requirements for AI should be told to contact the GLO, yes. But we shouldn't get mad at the askers. We should get mad at people who tell the private information.

It seems that more AI threads get ruined by active GC members then by crazy PNAIs. (Not that there aren't both) I don't know why sensible modding and some discretion on the part of the sorority members couldn't solve most of the AI problems. And as for the crazies, their lack discretion will directly affect their AI process. Thus letting that particular problem solve itself.

I think the problem is, the answer is different depending on the GLO. For some GLOs, contacting the GLO is the absolute WRONG thing to do. The mods can't be expected to know the AI policies for all the groups either and shouldn't speak for other groups.

[Tom Earp]

Originally Posted by AGDee

I think the problem is, the answer is different depending on the GLO. For some GLOs, contacting the GLO is the absolute WRONG thing to do. The mods can't be expected to know the AI policies for all the groups either and shouldn't speak for other groups.

Yes it is! I tried to get the information straight and post it!

But, thank goodness it has been changed to other MODS!

Oh, MODs who are doing their best!

Are They getting assistance, NO!

[AGDee]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

Yes it is! I tried to get the information straight and post it!

That's my whole point, Tom... few here are qualified to give you the correct information in the first place. Just because one member on GC tells you something, it doesn't mean it is the correct information. Let the HQ's field the questions if someone is interested.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by AGDee

I think the problem is, the answer is different depending on the GLO. For some GLOs, contacting the GLO is the absolute WRONG thing to do. The mods can't be expected to know the AI policies for all the groups either and shouldn't speak for other groups.

I understand that. It is up to sorority members to provide the correct information (or to avoid providing it) as they wish. But asking on here only makes someone ignorant (And they probably used google) not a desperate sorority shopper. Heck, someone who comes on here as a sorority shopper might actually learn her lesson.



While I agree there is private information that should not be shared and that this should be edited out (or modded if reported) AI is not synonymous with membership selection. Part of the AI process is MS. But I do not believe the rest of it should be edited out of GC simply because it bugs some people.

(at the same time, the snark and sarcasm shouldn't be edited out either.. the less editing the better)

PNAIs are NOT tearing this sub-forum apart. Active members are. (And Earp is helping)

[Jen]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

I agree that private information and particularly ritual information should be kept private. However I feel the focus on here is wrong. Someone ASKING about the requirements for AI should be told to contact the GLO, yes. But we shouldn't get mad at the askers. We should get mad at people who tell the private information.

PNAMs should not have to ask - a simple "read this first" thread directing them to contact the sorority of their choice should be enough. Why get information on what a PNAM feels is very important from someone random on GC when you could go to the actual source, the sorority, and get the most accurate information possible?

They can email IHQ, ask if they have AI and if they qualify and if so, how do they begin the process and get all of the information they need through correct channels, NOT GC.

[TrueBlueKappa]

Originally Posted by ariesrising

PNAMs should not have to ask - a simple "read this first" thread directing them to contact the sorority of their choice should be enough. Why get information on what a PNAM feels is very important from someone random on GC when you could go to the actual source, the sorority, and get the most accurate information possible?

They can email IHQ, ask if they have AI and if they qualify and if so, how do they begin the process and get all of the information they need through correct channels, NOT GC.

Completely agree.

[Jen]

Even though people say contacting HQ can be the wrong thing - I contacted one b/c I didn't know their AI policy and I asked about it. They politely told me I had to know someone in the sorority and they didn't allow people to contact them to get introduced for AI and wished me well. They weren't offended I asked, I wasn't offended they told me I didn't qualify and it worked out just fine.

[honeychile]

Originally Posted by ariesrising

Even though people say contacting HQ can be the wrong thing - I contacted one b/c I didn't know their AI policy and I asked about it. They politely told me I had to know someone in the sorority and they didn't allow people to contact them to get introduced for AI and wished me well. They weren't offended I asked, I wasn't offended they told me I didn't qualify and it worked out just fine.

Thank you for clarifying this. I know that I was led to believe that contacting our Executive Office would be a very bad move on the part of a PNAI, but the person who told me that is a stickler for the rules and may have overstated the situation.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by ariesrising

PNAMs should not have to ask - a simple "read this first" thread directing them to contact the sorority of their choice should be enough. Why get information on what a PNAM feels is very important from someone random on GC when you could go to the actual source, the sorority, and get the most accurate information possible?

They can email IHQ, ask if they have AI and if they qualify and if so, how do they begin the process and get all of the information they need through correct channels, NOT GC.

Note: I'm going to compare AI to Recruitment, I know this is not a direct comparison, etc.

In theory, this would be ok. Except that this is like saying that a PNM shouldn't ask questions on here, they should read a sticky and ask their Greek Life office. I don't think it's a bad thing for PNAMs to talk about their stories ahead of time. If anything, it lets you correct things before they progress to far.