Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul D-Psi-ple
Did I answer your questions a little better?
|
Perhaps, and thanks.
But I'm still trying to figure this out. You say of drinking: "That's an individual thing I believe. If they get caught and none of us are involved, then thats on them." Why isn't the same true here if it turns out that the pledges did this on their own, without chapter involvement or encouragement?
As an aside, it appears from reading a number of articles in UGA's
The Red and Black that the chapter was suspended not because of the actions of the pledges
per se, but because the University is investigating whether the pledges did what they did as a result of hazing. In other words, the investigation seems to be focused on possible hazing rather than on the incredibly stupid (at best) act itself.
Threaded Mode
