Lame?

tunatartare · #1 07-16-2006, 10:14 PM

If you're like 34 and are still a virgin, then usually that's a sign of something.

tld221 · #2 07-16-2006, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KLPDaisy

If you're like 34 and are still a virgin, then usually that's a sign of something.

what? aside from not getting laid?

AKΨ_BRO@DSU · #3 07-16-2006, 10:24 PM

Gaaaawd, I hope it won't be THAT long (lol)...but I guess the only thing it would show is that the person is that way for a reason, mostly likely of their own choosing.

preciousjeni · #4 07-16-2006, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KLPDaisy

If you're like 34 and are still a virgin, then usually that's a sign of something.

A sign of not finding the right person yet? I know someone older than 34 that is still a virgin because he has chosen not to give himself to a person that he doesn't intend to marry.

afboiler · #5 07-16-2006, 11:30 PM

I would never date him....seems like he is too clean-cut for me....I like people can drink responsibly in a social situation and have a good time....I find guys like him do not mix with my social responsibilities of my job.

PhiMuAmberkins · #6 07-17-2006, 01:29 AM

Our lifestyles wouldn't mesh at all, so I wouldn't date him...but I don't think I'd think he was lame.

sdsuchelle · #7 07-17-2006, 02:42 AM

I wouldn't consider him lame -- however I probably wouldn't date him, because I engage in some of those activities from time to time.

Scandia · #8 07-17-2006, 07:58 AM

Not at all! Please send him over here to me!

Marie · #9 07-17-2006, 11:42 AM

Well at 21 I think it would be fine. If he was significantly older, then it would depend on whether he was a virgin by choice (character) or by default (personality).

Rudey · #10 07-17-2006, 11:52 AM

I would think he was gay.

And if any girl tells you it's OK, ask for her picture.

-Rudey
--And that's the best advice you will get.

tunatartare · #11 07-17-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marie

Well at 21 I think it would be fine. If he was significantly older, then it would depend on whether he was a virgin by choice (character) or by default (personality).

That's what I meant by my earlier post. Thank you for putting it better than I did.

AKΨ_BRO@DSU · #12 07-17-2006, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scandia

Not at all! Please send him over here to me!

LOL, in the case you hadn't caught on yet, I was talk about myself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudey

I would think he was gay.

And if any girl tells you it's OK, ask for her picture

Ouch!

Quote:

Originally Posted by afboiler

I would never date him....seems like he is too clean-cut for me....I like people can drink responsibly in a social situation and have a good time....I find guys like him do not mix with my social responsibilities of my job

How is it possible to be too clean cut? And just because someone doesn't drink doesn't mean that they don't know how to have a good time...in fact, the fact they don't need anything extra to do so would say a lot. What are the "social responsibilities" of your job?

Drolefille · #13 07-17-2006, 05:41 PM

I know some people's jobs "require" them to host clients in bars/restaurants and if you're not having a beer with them, there's something wrong with that.

Not sure I agree, but I wouldn't be having that job myself.

Some people assume that those who DON'T drink are preachy about it. While I have my own feelings about alcohol, and those who need it to have fun, I pretty much keep it to myself unless asked.

I do think drug use is stupid, though I've seen good arguments for legalization. I've never felt the need to impair myself to either relax or have fun.

There are girls out there, and yes Rudey, attractive girls, who will find you attractive. You may be hanging out with the wrong crowd though...

Dionysus · #14 07-17-2006, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKΨ_BRO@DSU

How is it possible to be too clean cut? And just because someone doesn't drink doesn't mean that they don't know how to have a good time...in fact, the fact they don't need anything extra to do so would say a lot.

Exactly. I've never really been flat out wasted before, I'm only a social drinker, and was a non-drinker up until my early twenties. I am in NO WAY a prude or too clean cut. I'm naturally an unhibited person, I don't need that much booze, if any, to act a fool, be outgoing, or do crazy things. It sucks to be stereotyped as some introverted party-pooper who does nothing but play chess and the violin on your weekend nights.

valkyrie · #15 07-17-2006, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKΨ_BRO@DSU

How is it possible to be too clean cut? And just because someone doesn't drink doesn't mean that they don't know how to have a good time...in fact, the fact they don't need anything extra to do so would say a lot.

You might not have intended it, but this quote reveals a bit of why I personally would never date a guy who didn't drink. There seems to be a little high-and-mighty about the way you say "the fact they don't need anything extra to do so would say a lot." What, exactly, would it say? It seems you're implying that people who drink "need" to do so to have a good time. That in itself comes off as preachy to me.

As for the virgin thing, again, not my cup of tea, but I'm sure some women would appreciate it.