Why are recs absolutely necessary at some schools, while not expected at others?

[Hartofsec]

Originally Posted by Titchou

This is the key - do you really know how to write a "proper SEC rec?" Without asking for private MS information, do you know what YOUR group considers a proper rec? I know how to write a lot of different kinds of recs:

Considering the numbers of OOS PNMs, and the OOS composition of pledge classes at Bama, I doubt that the OOS alumnae writing these recs have ever heard of “a proper SEC rec.” I’ve actually never heard that term – and I’ve written recs at Bama for decades.

Originally Posted by Titchou

one for a top girl coming out of a top HS, one for an average to above average girl who may not look all that great on paper but would really be an asset, one for the girl who is average or below (for whatever reasons) but who does look good on paper and, of course, the "no" rec no matter if she is Ms Dog Hollow.

I don’t agree with writing unsolicited “no” recs. If there is some (verified) circumstance that would call a girl’s eventual membership into question, then that could be communicated privately to a chapter advisor -- rec or not. I feel like the other information (academics, activities, etc) is the same regardless of who submits the info (alum or PNM).

Originally Posted by Titchou

It's not just filling out the form and checking boxes. It's the added info...stellar academic and supportive, involved Greek family or very average student according to her HS counselor, always had concerns about her academics, will be taking remedial classes,

I hope that no high school counselor, in her capacity as a high school counselor, is discussing girls with sorority alumnae – this would be a violation of confidentiality, and potential liability with a capital L.

.