GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,750
Threads: 115,669
Posts: 2,205,175
Welcome to our newest member, agelmaarleyz434
» Online Users: 6,311
0 members and 6,311 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:07 AM
AOII Angel AOII Angel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppyGPhiB View Post
My mother has been struggling to control her type II diabetes since she was diagnosed with it nearly 10 years ago. First the doctor and dietitians worked with her on controlling it just with diet. She made a ton of progress, lost a lot of weight, eventually retired (which happened to also improve her health), but even after all that work, her blood sugar readings and organ functioning tests still aren't good enough. So now she's finally on insulin...after all this time. Diabetes is extremely hard to control, even with medication. And to punish people for trying to control it is WRONG. Since your company owns the HMO I'm sure they know what happens to their employees when they don't treat their diabetes.

I would be furious if my company went with an insurance plan with a list of qualifications like that. Pretty much the only group of people that qualify for those low rates are young employees, since high blood pressure, high cholesterol, weight gain and diabetes are common in older demographics.
You're looking at this wrong. No one is punishing anyone. The company is combining a group and individual insurance policy method. To give you an example, I have chronic migraines. Recently I had to try to buy medical insurance on the individual market in Arizona. I was turned down by every single carrier in the state despite having $1000 a month stipend from my employer to pay my premiums. $1000! If your mother tried to buy insurance on the individual market, she would be uninsurable. The only reason she has insurance is because she has group insurance. The other employees could argue that she is punishing them with higher premiums because of her bad health. The company has made the decision to split the difference and give small breaks to people who meet specific markers and increase premiums for people who don't. Is it fair? What is fair? While I wish that I could get an insurance policy, I can understand why no one will insure me. When and if I get an individual policy under HCR, it will cost my an arm and a leg. I also know how much it costs to insure a poorly controlled diabetic on insulin, whether or not her poorly controlled state is all "her fault." In the end, we both still cost a lot to insure.
__________________

AOII

One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!




Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SC Dems tell Colbert No Thanks! sageofages Entertainment 4 11-01-2007 10:30 PM
Countering the Dems AlphaFrog News & Politics 29 07-24-2007 03:17 PM
cut deficit in half in 5 years? ask GWB how.... IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 0 12-20-2004 04:15 PM
Deficit and voting kappaloo News & Politics 8 09-08-2004 11:00 AM
RECORD BREAKING DEFICIT CrimsonTide4 Delta Sigma Theta 24 02-02-2004 04:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.