Quote:
Originally Posted by cutie_cat_4ever
Instead of all these debating back an forth, why not let your own GLO HQ people decide on this matter? Your HQ will know EXACTLY what to say and what not to say and let them clarify and suggest whether this forum should exist. Because afterall, it's your GLO image (or point of view) and what better person to say rather than your HQ?
I'm sure they will be really concern the things that are going on this forum, and even if they didn't want to actively talk about it on these forums, they could at least email the mods and let them know their concerns. That's called damage control. Even many of you said that the info on the website implies what to say or what not, in a lot of cases, not many people will go actively to serach on their websites. That's why they turn to GC.
Umm....I guess that's my 2 cents there, please correct me if I'm wrong, thanks!  hehe |
Greekchat's been around for over 7 years already. I'm sure members of our Inter/national Councils/HQs are aware of this site and already patrol the boards.
With the exception of 2 very active GC posters who also serve their organization at the highest level (that I know of, there may be more), most HQ officers are reluctant to post. Having an official speaking on behalf of the Fraternity on GreekChat I assume would open up a can of worms. HQs don't have full control over content that's posted here on GC, or on our own individual chapter websites, for that matter.
I (along with other GCers) wasn't even allowed to mention GreekChat anywhere near any of the International Council at a Convention I went to. That's enough for me to know how much they don't like GreekChat. That said, I doubt they'll be doing what you're suggesting anytime soon.
Threaded Mode
