GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,746
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,138
Welcome to our newest member, AlfredEmpom
» Online Users: 2,596
1 members and 2,595 guests
Xidelt
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2005, 07:43 AM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
Thumbs down Sounds like Rumsfeld forgot his "Support Our Troops" Bumper Sticker

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._pe/iraq_armor
Quote:
U.S. Misses Soldier Reimbursement Deadline
White House - AP Cabinet & State

By LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Defense Department hasn't developed a plan to reimburse soldiers for equipment they've bought to fight in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites) despite requirements in a law passed last year, a senator says.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., asked details on the Pentagon's progress setting up the reimbursement program and questioned why it was not in place yet.

"Very simply, this is either negligence on their part, because they were not happy with this when it passed, or it's incompetence," Dodd said. "It's pretty outrageous when you have all their rhetoric about how much we care about our people in uniform."

Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke said Rumsfeld will respond to Dodd's letter after he has reviewed it. She had no comment on the progress of reimbursement regulations.

Soldiers serving in Iraq and their families have reported buying everything from higher-quality protective gear to armor for their Humvees, medical supplies and even global positioning devices.

In response to the complaints, Congress last year passed Dodd's amendment requiring the Pentagon to reimburse members of the Armed Services for the cost of any safety or health equipment that they bought or someone else bought on their behalf.

Under the law, the Defense Department had until Feb. 25 to develop regulations on the reimbursement, which is limited to $1,100 per item.

Dodd asked that Rumsfeld provide details on the department's progress. But he also said it was unclear what recourse he has, other than public embarrassment, to force the Defense Department to act.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who repeatedly decried the lack of equipment during his unsuccessful presidential campaign, said the Pentagon needs to move quickly to give the troops their reimbursement and armored Humvees.

"They should be living up to the letter of the law," Kerry said.

The latest emergency spending proposal for the war totals $81.9 billion, including $74.9 billion for the Defense Department. It includes $3.3 billion for extra armor for trucks and other protective gear — underscoring a sensitivity to earlier complaints by troops.
"you go to war with the army you have and whatever they have"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2005, 02:14 PM
Coramoor Coramoor is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Sand Box
Posts: 1,145
Send a message via AIM to Coramoor
I really haven't heard too much abou this...but from my experiences the army has standard issues and anything extra you buy with your own money is your choice. I don't see why the gov't should have to reimburse soldiers for that.

I mean, I was issued all sorts of gear that will get the job done...but I wanted better stuff that would make me a lot more comfortable while doing the job and I spent my own money on that. I decided it was worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2005, 04:59 PM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
Quote:
Originally posted by Coramoor
but I wanted better stuff that would make me a lot more comfortable while doing the job
wait- armor for the humvee so the soldier doesnt get killed by bombs should come out of the soldier's pocket and not our government that put them in harm's way in the first place?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2005, 05:10 PM
Rudey Rudey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
Quote:
Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
wait- armor for the humvee so the soldier doesnt get killed by bombs should come out of the soldier's pocket and not our government that put them in harm's way in the first place?
I brought this up earlier. People told me that the armor issue is being made to be more than it is and it doesn't help.

-Rudey
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2005, 06:46 PM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,026
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
It should be tax deductible.
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.