GreekChat.com Forums
Celebrating 25 Years of GreekChat!

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 326,164
Threads: 115,594
Posts: 2,200,762
Welcome to our newest member, Forevercommit24
» Online Users: 1,821
2 members and 1,819 guests
LaneSig
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2005, 07:43 PM
PhiPsiRuss PhiPsiRuss is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Listening to a Mariachi band on the N train
Posts: 5,707
Send a message via ICQ to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via AIM to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via Yahoo to PhiPsiRuss
Lightbulb U.S. Invests in Radiation Detectors for Ports

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...y_radiation_dc

By Alan Elsner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is stepping up investment in radiation detection devices at its ports to thwart attempts to smuggle a nuclear device or dirty bomb into the country, a Senate committee heard on Wednesday. _

Robert Bonner, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, told a Senate subcommittee on homeland security that since the first such devices were installed in May 2000, they had picked up over 10,000 radiation hits in vehicles or cargo shipments entering the country. All proved harmless.

The Bush administration is requesting $125 million for fiscal year 2006 to continue the acquisition, deployment and enhancement of such technology. It has 400 units deployed.

"We are deploying nuclear and radiological detection equipment to include personal radiation detectors, radiation portal monitors and radiation isotope identifier devices," Bonner told the subcommittee.

As an example of how the system was working, Bonner said on Jan. 26, 2005, a machines got a hit from a South Korean vessel at the Los Angeles seaport. The radiation turned out to be emanating from the ship's fire extinguishing system and was no threat to safety.

Bonner and two other senior homeland security officials all said the nation was much safer than it had been on Sept. 11, 2001, when hijackers commandeered four planes and attacked New York and Washington, killing some 2,700 people.


"We're much better off. We're far beyond where we were a couple of years ago," said Eduardo Aguirre, director of citizenship and immigration services.

In last year's presidential election campaign, Democrat John Kerry attacked what he said was the Bush administration's failure to protect ports and monitor materials imported into the country.

Bonner said searching all the cargo and people entering the country was impossible. The aim was to scrutinize all of the cargo and people identified as high risk.

With almost 25,000 seagoing containers off-loaded at U.S. ports each day, containerized shipping was "uniquely vulnerable to terrorist attack," he said.

The government was enlisting foreign governments to identify and inspect as much material bound for the United States as possible before it was shipped. So far, 35 major foreign seaports were participating in the program.

Democrats on the committee criticized the administration for failing to hire enough border patrol agents. Congress authorized the addition of 2,000 agents last year but the administration is proposing to hire only 210.

"Despite this testimony, there is virtually no funding in the budget to increase our border security," said West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd


---------------------------------------------------

Its about damn time. In my opinion, this is the single most important thing that can be done to protect us (mostly me) against the unthinkable.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.