"Are we as tolerant of people within our own community who have different viewpoints, as we expect others to be of us?"
Personally, I don't think so. I do think that we expect people of like backgrounds to have similar opinions, because since we assume that we have all been through the same experiences, we know where they are coming from. That concept works in theory, but not necessarily in practice. I do not expect a person who was raised in an affluent environment to understand and empathize with the plight of a minority single mother who is merely surviving on 1 income with a salary that barely keeps food on the table or vice versa. However, when a person in that same predicament is not on the same political page, it can me more frustrating because we think in the back of our minds that they should know better. Everyone has a right to their opinion, unfortunately many times the opinion is too superficial. It is based on media perpetuated ideas and propaganda, and people go along with it because it looks good on the surface. (Kinda like the Gospel Choir at the Republican Nat'l Convention) That segues me into my next point about Powell and Rice. Yes I do have alot of respect for Powell, however he has not been appointed to a position that has any influence to change things based on the opinions that he has about affirmative action, etc. It is kind of like having a running back who can do the 100 in 4.2 play defense. It is a waste of talent and resources based on where he would be the most beneficial.
(Yes, I am a sports fan!
) I know that move was intentional by Bush, but he would be a fool to put Powell in a position where he could influence the state of affirmative action, since he (Bush) is against it. Bush referrs to Affirmative Action as Affirmative Access :roll eyes:. He may be slow, but he's not THAT dumb!
Condoleeza Rice has done nothing for the black community in the past, but maybe that will change. I doubt it, but you never know. I do know that she has not been very vocal about minority issues at Stanford, and in undergrad she decided to join a GLO instead of a BGLO. She has absolutely every right to do so, the only point I am tring to make about that is I don't want to see people frustrated about her actions in her appointed position once the new administration takes office. Some people will think she is a mouthpiece for minority issues because she is one, and that is not necessarily true. we need to go on peoples records, not solely on the color of their skin. If we do, we will be disappointed. the appointments that Bush is making should be assesed by their actions and policies. He did not do hardly any campaigning in the black community before, but now he knows that as a whole his approval rating among African-Americans is less than 10%,(even lower in his home state of Texas!) so I see this as a move to pacify us. It is very after the fact. As far as the situation with the response that you recieved from telling the woman to give up, I do not think that Gore should have given up either. Sometimes an initial fight becomes a foundation for ultimate change, and I think the same theory applies here. It will take more than one thrown election, but it is bigger than that. It took more than one school busing protest, it took more than one march, and it took more than one Dr. King speech. It was a foundation for change, and if rightousness did not come out of it this time, than maybe the people that refuse to give up the losing battles in the future can help update the ballots, reduce intimidation, and eliminate disenfranchisement. When you do not speak out on an issue, it is equivalent to silently endorsing it. That's my $19.13 on the situation. I'm long winded, so I know I passed 2 cents a long time ago!
Sincerely
soror6
Anchor D.S.N.V. - Spring '91
_____________________________________________
looking for the best in greek gear? Log on!
www.greekuniversity.com