» GC Stats |
Members: 329,701
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,908
|
Welcome to our newest member, ashleyyadext148 |
|
 |
|

08-13-2003, 01:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,361
|
|
question for sororities
Okay this is not a personal situation question, but a question that I've been wanting to know the answer for awhile. Plus I have a friend who got pregnant in high school, kept her baby and has been thinking about rushing, so I was curious.
Does your sorority have policies about pregnant sisters or sisters with children?
When I say pregnant, I mean a sisters whose active and gets pregnant.
When I say a sister with children, I'm really asking about a woman who rushes and she has a child.
Thanks girls
Brianna
Alpha Delta Pi
|

08-13-2003, 01:19 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,518
|
|
here are some threads...
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

08-13-2003, 01:54 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 99
|
|
In one of the other sororities on my campus, a girl just had twins a few months ago. It's not my chapter so I don't know what their policy is but I know I'm personally really excited abt that and to meet her babies, I think her sisters are totally accepting of that as well and I don't see it being a problem with those women and I don't really see it as being something their chapter would hide at all.
|

08-13-2003, 02:33 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: atlanta....its hot here... cant breath... too humid... helppp
Posts: 279
|
|
according to our rules if you get pregnant you go alum. im not sure if that is just a suggestion or mandatory.
however, i think that is appropriate.
as for girls with kids already, i have no idea.
Last edited by AOcutiePi4ever; 08-13-2003 at 02:38 PM.
|

08-13-2003, 02:48 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 99
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AOcutiePi4ever
according to our rules if you get pregnant you go alum. im not sure if that is just a suggestion or mandatory.
however, i think that is appropriate.
as for girls with kids already, i have no idea.
|
AOcutiePi,
Is that in our IHQs guidelines or are those your chapters bylaws?
|

08-13-2003, 03:21 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 397
|
|
we have member who found out she is pregnant over the summer and was automatically made an alum. But i believe that it's the members choice. This is the third time since I've been a Sigma Kappa that a member got pregnant and each time they go alum.
__________________
SigmaKappa UNLVTheta Eta
|

08-13-2003, 03:50 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: You're looking at Planet Earth
Posts: 6,551
|
|
My comments are concerning either current collegians and young mothers considering NPC collegiate recruitment. They are not applicable to those women considering AI into a NPC group. All comments are my own opinions, and mine only:
The responsibilities of parenting are just so incredible. It can be next to impossible to balance school, sorority, a job (if applicable) and parenthood. You and your child simply must be first, then prioritize school and work for yourself. Sorority life is a committment, and there are many evening and weekend functions that you as a sister are required to attend. If you are a sister who is pregnant, or a young mother considering recruitment--what will you do with your child when you are required to be at a sorority function? Most, if not all, official sorority functions are not designed to have children in attendance. If there are children in attendance, most likely they are the infant child of an adviser.
I don't believe any sorority or fraternity could discriminate against a person who is married or who has children. I just don't think a GLO would be as inclined to take a new member with such all-encompassing responsibility as their own child. It's a lifetime committment to join a sorority, just as it is a lifetime committment to raise a child.
No, I do not recommend a return to the days of "you are kicked out forever if you got pregnant" (and trust me folks, it happened and probably still does happen in 2003.) These women (speaking for sororities here) should be allowed to elect alumna status without penalty against their membership, provided they are in good-standing at the time of request.
Christin
(repeat--this was my own opinion only and does not necessarily reflect any official or unofficial stance by my Fraternity.)
__________________
"If you want to criticize my methods, fine. But you can keep your snide remarks to yourself. And while you're at it, don't criticize my methods." Rupert Giles, BtVS
|

08-14-2003, 09:43 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 5,112
|
|
i know of a certain member from a sorority who got pregnant and had to go alum
|

08-14-2003, 10:46 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Illinois & Wisconsin
Posts: 26
|
|
A girl at my school, in another sorority, just recently had her child. She just graduated in May, and I think had the baby in June. She was not forced to go alumnae (sp?) status, in fact, she was pregnant during formal recruitment and it did not affect anyone's reaction of her. She and her boyfriend got married a few days before the baby was born, but i think he is just going into his senior year now... I'm friends with some of his fraternity brothers and they all have different stories as to where they're going to live. However, the story is concerning her (sorry for getting off track). She was able to stay in her sorority until the end, so I have a feeling that (at least for some sororities) it is up to the individual chapter.
|

08-14-2003, 10:52 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Highway To Heaven
Posts: 1,365
|
|
last year, our sorority's panhell delegate was a mom
she was still active in sorority
but that's because a lot of our alum have kids
and if we want them to come, we have to go to kid friendly places
in case a babysitter falls through
so, i think she was comfortable staying active
|

08-14-2003, 11:34 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Leavenworth, KS
Posts: 1,805
|
|
I can think of two girls in my chapter who got pregnant while active. One got married and went alum and the other stayed active. I know of one girl who came through recruitment and she had a 2 year old and she did become our sister.
|

08-14-2003, 11:56 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,361
|
|
I think y'all are right it's up to the individual chapter. I say this because one of the chapters here I noticed a girl who looked visibly pregnant. Probably about 4-5 months along. I mean it's pretty easy to tell the difference between someone whose pregnant and someones whose (I hate to say this) overweight. She was still an active collegian. So I have feeling the offer of going alumna is made but it's not enforced. I mean how can they force a girl who has done above and beyond what's required of her but she's makes one mistake and ends up pregnant. I mean we as her sisters should support her instead of punishing her. Do y'all understand what I mean?
Thanks for all the information. I appreciate it.
Brianna
Alpha Delta Pi
|

08-14-2003, 01:08 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 597
|
|
As far as I know my national doesn't have policy on this. My personal opinion though is if we had a rush who had children I wouldn't be inclined to give her bid because I don't think someone really can have enough time to go to school, pledge a sorority and raise a child properly. Pledging takes a lot of time which includes a lot of last minute meetings and events and I don't know how any responsible mother would really be able to fully participate. Maybe its unfair of me to make that decision for them but we have not given bids to women in other situations when we didn't believe they could handle the time committment involved in pledging. Especially during formal rush, I would be hesitant to take that risk and lose someone who we are more certain could make the time committment.
|

08-14-2003, 01:22 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 3,915
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AEPhiSierra
As far as I know my national doesn't have policy on this. My personal opinion though is if we had a rush who had children I wouldn't be inclined to give her bid because I don't think someone really can have enough time to go to school, pledge a sorority and raise a child properly. Pledging takes a lot of time which includes a lot of last minute meetings and events and I don't know how any responsible mother would really be able to fully participate. Maybe its unfair of me to make that decision for them but we have not given bids to women in other situations when we didn't believe they could handle the time committment involved in pledging. Especially during formal rush, I would be hesitant to take that risk and lose someone who we are more certain could make the time committment.
|
There is a sister in on of the locals on campus (and I don't want to hear that locals are diffrent, this is one of the hardest locals on campus...you can probably guess which one) that has a 1 yr old son.....he turned 1 3 months or so after she got in. Yes it is diffcult, but as her ex-pledge sister I saw her able to balance between puilling in good grades, her son and pledging and now her commetment to her sorority. I know that SDT has a policy if you get married you go alum, but I don't think that applies to having a child...but I'm not sure about that one *BTW we have two sisters with kids...it makes things hard for them, and we understand when they aren't around but they try to be as active as they can*
__________________
Sigma Delta Tau
Patriae Multae Spes Una
Last edited by Buttonz; 08-15-2003 at 10:29 PM.
|

08-14-2003, 08:50 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Babyville!!! Yay!!!
Posts: 10,641
|
|
I really don't think that any NPC group has a national rule (and shouldn't have a local rule) that pregnant women must go alum or cannot join. That would VERY easily open them up to a lawsuit (not sure if it would be successful or not). Pregnancy discrimination occurs all the time in the workplace, and there's been more and more cases about it (only recently because of the change of women's status in the workplace over the past several decades).
I think a lot of it is the culture and attitude of the local chapter.
Bottom line is- if it's someone who's already your sister, I'd sure as all heck hope you'd continue to love and support her- she probably needs it more than most!
My personal feelings on the subject are like many of yours- your child should come first in your life, and sororities take a heck of a lot of time. BUT, it's also important for anyone to have a little bit of a life outside the child- it's good for you. There's arguements for each side.
Honestly- it could happen to any of you. The pill isn't 100%, condoms break, etc. Would you prefer the member to have an abortion (NOTE- this is not supporting nor going against abortion, just a note)? So it's easy to say you wouldn't want a pregnant woman in your chapter or someone who has kids, but you may change your tune if it happened to you. How would you feel if your sisters "kicked you out"? Many of us all aren't quite "pure as the driven snow"- it could easily happen to you or any of your sisters.
Just some general food for thought for everyone.
__________________
Yes, I will judge you for your tackiness.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|