GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Alpha > Alpha Kappa Alpha
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,721
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,957
Welcome to our newest member, zaaleislittle81
» Online Users: 2,524
2 members and 2,522 guests
PGD-GRAD, Xidelt
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-03-2002, 07:13 PM
DoggyStyle82 DoggyStyle82 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 902
This is a case of sistas having an inferiority complex. Because Alicia is light and India is dark is of little consequence to Grammy voters. Macy Gray is hella unattractive but she won multiple Grammys. Tracy Chapman is no beauty queen either and she has won Grammys on two different occasions. The plain and simple truth is that Alicia Keys music was more accessible to the Grammy voters in those categories. Lauryn Hill is very ethnic and also not light, but the Grammy voters loved her also. Lets not take the easy way out here and blame it on cosmetics and make this a referendum on the worth of ones complexion. Clive Davis plays the game better than Motown, thats all. India Arie looks just fine. She is not beautiful, but not unattractive either.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 03-03-2002, 10:56 PM
Mz. Sports Luva Mz. Sports Luva is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: ATL.. ATL...ATL...
Posts: 286
I agree w/ Doggy.

If we want certain artists to win, then we need to make sure that our local dj's & radio stations are registered to vote for/with the Grammy's.

I'm not sure of the proper name of the voting org, but call your local radio station & ask.

I don' t think that it's as simple as the "light vs. dark skin" thing.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 03-04-2002, 11:56 PM
librasoul22 librasoul22 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Here
Posts: 2,587
Okay...for Alicia vs. India...

I don't think it is right to discount Alicia for being marketable. The problem is that we were given so much hype for Alicia that it gave us expectations. They were bound to be pretty high considering that she was on Oprah, Letterman, SNL Season Premire, you name it. Also, "Fallin'" was the background music for EVERYTHING. Try to think how you would feel giving Alicia's CD an OBJECTIVE listen without all the hype and build-up surrounding it. It is a very solid album, with a few fillers here and there (Girlfriend, Jane Doe).

India.Arie had little recognition before her Grammy nominations. That is why her seven nominations were such a surprise to the people with more mainstream tastes. Sure she is a talent, but with lower expectations, there little room to say "I thought it would be better," which is what most people are saying about Alicia's CD.

Keep this in mind: Alicia Keys has creative control over her image and music. She wrote and composed most of her album (aside from the songs that were sampled/remade, of course). She left Columbia Records because they wanted her to conform into a pop princess, a la Britney. It is not fair to use Alicia's looks and charisma against her. She is deeply talented, in my opinion. Let us not lose sight of that because we are so eager to find flaws in her work.

BTW, I can think of SEVERAL artists who have had hype machines, that were all set to be the "next big thing," but never caught on. I would name a few but you have probably never heard of them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.