What do boys think of..

[RU OX Alum]

hahaha, yeah it would

[JonInKC]

Originally Posted by DominoTheta

It'd be funny if he called her Mamaw.

WHO'S YOUR MOMMY? WHO'S...YOUR...MOMMY...BITCH?

[AKA_Monet]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

No, gross was watching them dance together at our boss' daughter's wedding.

Now 10-15 years your junior... Hey, chickadee was robbin' the cradle...

My husband is 3 years younger than me. But we are both in our 30's.

Before I was married, a young man put it to me like this... When your 50, I'll be 42 and my back will still be good... A woman reaches her "peak" well after her 50's and it pretty much starts in her late 20's to mid-30's...

If chick doesn't wind up with kids or female problems, she's fully functional in the "spin move".

Besides, virgins cannot do the tantra. They don't know where it's at.

[tld221]

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet

Besides, virgins cannot do the tantra. They don't know where it's at.

LOL made me giggle.

actually this has been an issue with all the guys ive dated. on one hand, they found it hot, but it shifted the relationship big time. either they were all over me, trying to hit it, or wouldnt even kiss me. its like, "dayum, i DO know how to control myself, how bout you do the same?"

so it seems to be pretty split. there are guys who think its super hot, cause they think theyll be the first. but then there are guys who HATE it because then there's a chance they WILL be the first, and dont want to handle all the emotional behind it.

[Dionysus]

A possible solution: Use friend sex as a stepping stone to relationship sex?

1. There's not a lot of emotion in friend sex, well it's not supposed to be.

2. Voila, you're no longer a virgin when you cross over into relationship sex, and you had a little "practice".

3. Of course, you don't do this DURING a major relationship, you do it before, lol. And, it may defeat the purpose if you're one of those people looking for "the one".

[KAY10]

I'd rather be with a virgin or a woman with little experience than a freak.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by KAY10

I'd rather be with a virgin or a woman with little experience than a freak.

I couldn't disagree more.

[KAY10]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

I couldn't disagree more.

Why do you disagree?

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by KAY10

Why do you disagree?

No one wants to kick it with a disease bag, but honestly the term "freak" doesn't have negative connotation for me - in fact, I think most people want to be with someone who is sexually adventurous, knows what she wants, and is a sexual person.

Now, the average virgin is nowhere near these things - this is not an indictment of virginity; far be it from me to do anything of the like. However, the average virgin simply is not comfortable enough with sex or sexuality, in my (limited) experience, and requires a LOT of patience and 'coaching' (perhaps cajoling, perhaps simply communication - obviously YMMV). "Little experience", not surprisingly, does little to offset this barrier.

Does this mean I would never date a virgin? Of course not. Does this mean the sex with 'a freak' (versus a virgin or someone with little experience) would most likely be (much) better, especially at first? Obviously.

So, when we compare the two, AND ASSUMING ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP ARE EQUAL (I'm not going to give you that out), I would obviously prefer the person with whom the sexual aspect started on a much higher level. It just makes sense.

[KAY10]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

No one wants to kick it with a disease bag, but honestly the term "freak" doesn't have negative connotation for me - in fact, I think most people want to be with someone who is sexually adventurous, knows what she wants, and is a sexual person.

Now, the average virgin is nowhere near these things - this is not an indictment of virginity; far be it from me to do anything of the like. However, the average virgin simply is not comfortable enough with sex or sexuality, in my (limited) experience, and requires a LOT of patience and 'coaching' (perhaps cajoling, perhaps simply communication - obviously YMMV). "Little experience", not surprisingly, does little to offset this barrier.

Does this mean I would never date a virgin? Of course not. Does this mean the sex with 'a freak' (versus a virgin or someone with little experience) would most likely be (much) better, especially at first? Obviously.

So, when we compare the two, AND ASSUMING ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP ARE EQUAL (I'm not going to give you that out), I would obviously prefer the person with whom the sexual aspect started on a much higher level. It just makes sense.

Dude, a freak? Man, I wouldn't get serious with a freak. I would get serious with a virgin though. A virgin generally is going to do what the more experience person likes to do. They know nothing else. A freak is going to want to do all kinds of things. Somethings I would never do. Thats a different thread though. But anyway, I like the basic woman. I would have a ton of patience with a virgin. But a freak? Hell no. I agree with you though, a freak doesn't mean she's a whore, I'm just saying 9 times out of 10 if she's doing that freaky stuff, she's obviously freaked several others before me. I'm not down with that. But to each his own.

[mulattogyrl]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

No one wants to kick it with a disease bag, but honestly the term "freak" doesn't have negative connotation for me - in fact, I think most people want to be with someone who is sexually adventurous, knows what she wants, and is a sexual person.

Now, the average virgin is nowhere near these things - this is not an indictment of virginity; far be it from me to do anything of the like. However, the average virgin simply is not comfortable enough with sex or sexuality, in my (limited) experience, and requires a LOT of patience and 'coaching' (perhaps cajoling, perhaps simply communication - obviously YMMV). "Little experience", not surprisingly, does little to offset this barrier.

Does this mean I would never date a virgin? Of course not. Does this mean the sex with 'a freak' (versus a virgin or someone with little experience) would most likely be (much) better, especially at first? Obviously.

So, when we compare the two, AND ASSUMING ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP ARE EQUAL (I'm not going to give you that out), I would obviously prefer the person with whom the sexual aspect started on a much higher level. It just makes sense.

I agree with you. I think I'd rather deal with someone who's comfortable in their sexuality. A virgin probably wouldn't be, not to mention the emotional baggage that would come with a virgin. Yes, I'm a female and I said it. LOL

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by KAY10

I agree with you though, a freak doesn't mean she's a whore, I'm just saying 9 times out of 10 if she's doing that freaky stuff, she's obviously freaked several others before me. I'm not down with that. But to each his own.

See, this isn't really a 'deal-breaker' for me - I've obviously freaked several others before her, so there's really no room for me to show off hangups about it, you know?

It would be really hypocritical of me.

[valkyrie]

Originally Posted by KAY10

Dude, a freak? Man, I wouldn't get serious with a freak. I would get serious with a virgin though. A virgin generally is going to do what the more experience person likes to do. They no nothing else. A freak is going to want to do all kinds of things. Somethings I would never do. Thats a different thread though. But anyway, I like the basic woman. I would have a ton of patience with a virgin. But a freak? Hell no. I agree with you though, a freak doesn't mean she's a whore, I'm just saying 9 times out of 10 if she's doing that freaky stuff, she's obviously freaked several others before me. I'm not down with that. But to each his own.

LOL so you're saying that you're terribly boring in bed. That's all well and good, even if you find yourself a nice, basic virgin, but I'll tell you this -- one day, she'll be in her thirties, and I'll bet you $$$ that she'll be bored with your vanilla sex. I suppose your best option is to make sure she pops out a bunch of kids by then and is too exhausted to think about it.

[_Opi_]

Originally Posted by KAY10

Dude, a freak? Man, I wouldn't get serious with a freak. I would get serious with a virgin though. A virgin generally is going to do what the more experience person likes to do. They no nothing else. A freak is going to want to do all kinds of things. Somethings I would never do. Thats a different thread though. But anyway, I like the basic woman. I would have a ton of patience with a virgin. But a freak? Hell no. I agree with you though, a freak doesn't mean she's a whore, I'm just saying 9 times out of 10 if she's doing that freaky stuff, she's obviously freaked several others before me. I'm not down with that. But to each his own.

You sound to me like you want a submissive, settling type of woman. You probably couldn't handle a woman who knows what she wants.

No offense, but to the people saying that virgins are not (generally) comfortable with their sexuality, I would have to disagree. A person can be comfortable with their sexuality and exercise some self-control (let's say because of religious values) AND not everyone has "emotional" baggage because their hymen is intact.

[mulattogyrl]

Originally Posted by _Opi_

You sound to me like you want a submissive, settling type of woman. You probably couldn't handle a woman who knows what she wants.

No offense, but to the people saying that virgins are not (generally) comfortable with their sexuality, I would have to disagree. A person can be comfortable with their sexuality and exercise some self-control (let's say because of religious values) AND not everyone has "emotional" baggage because their hymen is intact.

LOL. You're right, they might be comfortable with themselves, but I think the emotions come in once the 'deed' is done. It may very well not though.