I don't get the issue here. Essentially they are a GLO, who happen to be Christian based. I highly object to schools, public or private, funding our general accounts. The previous examples, like philanthropy fundraisers etc where money was given is a whole other potato. This was funding for an event and the event probably had to be open to the public to be eligible for a funding board. Totally different, we should be supported, if voting reps agree, when we do open campus events. The big issue is a group that flat out discriminates based on one factor, they should not be eligible for funding. Additionally, NPC, IFC and NPHC (i'm assuming) all have non-discriminatory clauses of the whole race, creed, etc but we reserve the right to discriminate based on sex. This is why we pay dues, among other reasons, and why this group should as well if they wish to have funds.
sorry if i'm incoherrent. my mind is foggy from work.