GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,899
Threads: 115,689
Posts: 2,207,107
Welcome to our newest member, lithicwillow
» Online Users: 2,061
1 members and 2,060 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2004, 07:29 PM
Munchkin03 Munchkin03 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
I've always wondered how the Conservative Christian Reich believes that gay marriage violates the sanctity of matrimony, but J.Lo and Britney Spears are A-OK?

Seriously--I'd rather see my accountant and his lawyer husband in a stable committed union than J.Ho and Twatney whoring it up.

Heterosexual privilege at its finest, my friends.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-14-2004, 08:51 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally posted by Munchkin03
I've always wondered how the Conservative Christian Reich believes that gay marriage violates the sanctity of matrimony, but J.Lo and Britney Spears are A-OK?

Seriously--I'd rather see my accountant and his lawyer husband in a stable committed union than J.Ho and Twatney whoring it up.

Heterosexual privilege at its finest, my friends.
I agree.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-14-2004, 09:19 PM
piphimaggie piphimaggie is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 259
Send a message via AIM to piphimaggie
It is a state issue, which is why it failed in the Senate.
I think what happens between two consenting adults is private and if they want to express their love through marital union, that should be their right whether they're bisexual, straight, gay, lesbian, etc.


....J. Ho....Twatney....lol, priceless....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2004, 10:18 PM
lifesaver lifesaver is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ya man's a headache, I'll be ya aspirin
Posts: 5,300
Ron Reagan put it best last night when Chris Matthews was grilling him on it. Matthews asked about the pologmy and beastiality thing. Reagan replied, "Those laws are on the books. The difference here is those laws apply equally to heterosexuals and homosexuals. This ammendment would restrict the rights of one entire class of citizens, and thats not what this country is about."

I had no idea Rick Santorum was such an extremest. "I would argue that the future of our country hangs in the balance because the future of marriage hangs in the balance," he said shortly before the vote. "Isn't that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?" Is he serious?

I watched the debate on CSPAN and they were all talkign about how awesome and sacred marrage was. So why wouldnt they want all aspects of society to have that?

Dolly Parton said on the Ellen show about gay marrage, "I'm all for it. Why should us straight people have to suffer alone?" lol.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-14-2004, 11:15 PM
Lil' Hannah Lil' Hannah is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the mothering hut
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally posted by lifesaver

I had no idea Rick Santorum was such an extremest. "I would argue that the future of our country hangs in the balance because the future of marriage hangs in the balance," he said shortly before the vote. "Isn't that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?" Is he serious?
Ha, you should read Savage Love, by Dan Savage. He's a gay man in a monogamous relationship with an adopted child, living very happily. He loves him some Santorum.
__________________
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O, Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it." - Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-14-2004, 11:16 PM
Rudey Rudey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
Quote:
Originally posted by lifesaver

Dolly Parton said on the Ellen show about gay marrage, "I'm all for it. Why should us straight people have to suffer alone?" lol.
It's not her joke. I don't like joke stealers. I used to know a kid in high school who would use my jokes on people and act like it was OK. I saw it on Spin City and I bet it's been used before.

-Rudey
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-15-2004, 01:05 AM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
Roll Call can be found here: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040714/D83QOP681.html

Gay Marriage Roll Call Vote

Jul 14, 3:42 PM (ET)
By The Associated Press

The 50-48 roll call by which the Senate blocked a constitutional amendment to
ban gay marriage. Supporters the amendment fell 12 votes short of the 60 they
needed to advance the bill.

On this vote, a "yes" vote was a vote to advance the measure and a "no" vote was
a vote to stop it.

Voting "yes" were 3 Democrats and 45 Republicans.

Voting "no" were 43 Democrats, 6 Republicans and 1 Independent.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2004, 01:50 AM
lifesaver lifesaver is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ya man's a headache, I'll be ya aspirin
Posts: 5,300
Quote:
Originally posted by Rudey
It's not her joke. I don't like joke stealers. I used to know a kid in high school who would use my jokes on people and act like it was OK. I saw it on Spin City and I bet it's been used before.

-Rudey
Maybe the writers of Spin City got it from her and she said it a long time a go and you just heard it from them first?

Last edited by lifesaver; 07-15-2004 at 02:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-15-2004, 01:52 AM
phikappapsiman phikappapsiman is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 280
Wow...

With all that's going on in our country, I find it so laughable that whenever there's a diversion from our soldiers dying in Iraq, and other lives lost around the world to keep us safe from terrorism, it's always an issue of "morality" that is raised. Think about it-from Clinton's "affair", to Janet Jackson's breast, now to the definition of marriage, it's ridiculous that this is even an issue. If marriage truly is a "sacred institution" for the basis of "procreation", then cool-let's outlaw divorces, all couples that have kids out of wedlock should be forced to get married, and if a couple cannot/will not have children in a set amount of time (2 years? 3 years?), then they should forfeit the right to be married. This way, marriage is truly a sacred union for the only purpose of raising children.

"...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere..."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-15-2004, 01:57 AM
lifesaver lifesaver is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ya man's a headache, I'll be ya aspirin
Posts: 5,300
Quote:
Originally posted by phikappapsiman


"...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere..."
Dig the MLK quote. My favorite of his.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-15-2004, 02:18 AM
phikappapsiman phikappapsiman is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally posted by lifesaver
Dig the MLK quote. My favorite of his.
Thanks! You know, as I was writing this, I put on one of my favorite Garth Brooks songs, "We Shall Be Free"-it really got me to thinking..."What if"??? What if what Garth sings about actually happened one day? If any of you reading this have the song, play it sometime...

"...This ain't coming from no prophet...just an ordinary man. When I close my eyes I see, the way this world could be, if we all walked hand in hand..."
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-15-2004, 03:22 AM
CSUSigEp CSUSigEp is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 512
Send a message via AIM to CSUSigEp
Letter from Birmingham Jail should be mandatory reading for everyone.

*back to the issue*

Maybe this is my California mindset talking here, but what is the big f'n deal? If gay people want to get married, let them. Its not going to hurt anyone, just let them do what they want!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-15-2004, 06:57 AM
mu_agd mu_agd is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fenway Park
Posts: 6,692
Send a message via AIM to mu_agd
Quote:
Originally posted by CSUSigEp
Maybe this is my California mindset talking here, but what is the big f'n deal? If gay people want to get married, let them. Its not going to hurt anyone, just let them do what they want!
i agree. part of why i'm glad i live in a state that allows it. it's none of my business what anyone else does in their home/bedroom as it's none of their business what i do in mine.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-15-2004, 08:36 AM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally posted by CSUSigEp

Maybe this is my California mindset talking here, but what is the big f'n deal? If gay people want to get married, let them. Its not going to hurt anyone, just let them do what they want!
I agree. You have to realize though that in our country, religion has always been a very strong influence. It waxes and wanes in terms of importance. Right now, we have caught it at a huge upswing. I'm not sure it's a really bad thing either.

Gay marriage is something that a lot of Christians (not just conservatives) take very personally.

It's also an election year. The Republicans have needed an issue that will turn out their base. The Dems have the war in Iraq, people thinking the rich make too much money, etc. Now, finally, the Republicans have something that will get their people excited and showing up to the polls. My thought is that the reason that this issue was brought up as an amendment was because the knew it would fail. If it had passed, then they would have lost something very important to their campaign.

The only legitimate reason I can see for being against gay marriage is because I don't want to pay higher insurance rates due to so many gay spouses requiring AIDS medication and treatment. Other than that, I don't see how it effects me.

Well, except that after law school, I plan to go into family law. So 10% of the population that couldn't have divorces will now be having divorces. That should offset any AIDS medication costs.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-15-2004, 08:53 AM
Munchkin03 Munchkin03 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
kt, do you have any information supporting that gay marriage would result in increased insurance premiums due to AIDS medications? Since so many health plans won't cover people due to pre-existing conditions like diabetes, I would imagine it might be difficult to have an AIDS patient covered. Plus, a lot of those medications aren't covered by insurance.

I've read about this topic a lot, and you're the only person I can come across who's said anything of the sort.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.