» GC Stats |
Members: 329,797
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,439
|
Welcome to our newest member, amesfrancesoz19 |
|
 |
|

03-17-2005, 03:58 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ooooooh snap!
Posts: 11,156
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ZTAngel
Fine. I'll post a pic of her HOT son, Prince William:
|
I second this!
Prince William makes me melt like butter on one of my grandma's homemade tortillas!!!
hahaha
|

03-17-2005, 04:31 PM
|
|
Technically he holds no royal title, but Queen Elizabeth II is his grandma:
Peter Phillips, son of Princess Anne, the Princess Royal
|

03-17-2005, 04:56 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 279
|
|
Does anyone else find it kind of interesting that so many countries still have "royalty"??
I think I'd be a little upset if my tax dollars and my money was going to support their lifestyle. But then again, I guess we do spend $10 to see bad movies to support our "celebrities".
|

03-17-2005, 06:47 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 5,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by cashmoney
I have a question for some of you, who would you consider American Royalty and what do you base your choice on?
|
America doesn't have Royalty. You made that choice when you declared independence and all that.
But if I was forced to choose, I would have to say American Royalty would be whoever the Hawaiian Royal family was....King Kamehameha, etc. I'm sure that there are some hot royal descendants around....(paging OTW for her knowledge / input....)
Last edited by CutiePie2000; 03-17-2005 at 06:49 PM.
|

03-17-2005, 08:34 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,571
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by agdbirmingham
Does anyone else find it kind of interesting that so many countries still have "royalty"??
I think I'd be a little upset if my tax dollars and my money was going to support their lifestyle. But then again, I guess we do spend $10 to see bad movies to support our "celebrities".
|
Actually -- at least with the British royalty, I believe it's claimed that the royals bring in more than enough in tourist dollars to cover how much they cost the country in taxes. Which explains one reason why the system hasn't been done away with despite its lack of relevance to the government today.
I don't think America has any "royalty," at least not these days. Although if we did, I think the Kennedys and the Bushes would both have to be included.
|

03-17-2005, 10:33 PM
|
|
I remember as a kid we'd go on field trips to Iolani Palace -- former home of King David Kalakaua and Queen Lydia Lil`uokalani until the overthrow. I remember being in awe at the grandeur of the place. It was so big and beautiful.
I still get the same feeling after all these years.
|

03-17-2005, 10:54 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Counting my blessings!
Posts: 31,436
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by agdbirmingham
Does anyone else find it kind of interesting that so many countries still have "royalty"??
I think I'd be a little upset if my tax dollars and my money was going to support their lifestyle. But then again, I guess we do spend $10 to see bad movies to support our "celebrities".
|
I have a good friend who lives in England, and her family is very anti-monarchy. The funny thing is, her mother was bound & determined to see Graceland before she died.
I mentioned that to my own mother, who replied, "They don't like the Queen, so they're coming here to see the King?"
And sugarandspice is right - as anti-monarchist as my friends are, they surely love the tourist money that the Royals generate!
__________________
~ *~"ADPi"~*~
♥Proud to be a Macon Magnolia ♥
"He who is not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
|

03-18-2005, 01:41 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuck in the 80s
Posts: 1,872
|
|
Felipe de Borbón y Grecia, Crown Prince of Spain
This man a beautiful...yummy......
Of course Prince William...i'm just so glad that Harry got cute, I was worried there for a while
|

03-18-2005, 02:05 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York City
Posts: 10,837
|
|
I knew a prince. He married a friend of the family. It wasn't that big of a deal. There are all sorts of people, including royals, living in NYC.
I agree that the Monaco royals are really great looking.
EWWWW I just googled images of Prince Albert. I had no idea that I would see such dirty pictures. EWWWWW!
|

03-18-2005, 10:48 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Huntsville, Alabama - ahem - Kwaj East!
Posts: 3,710
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KillarneyRose
Princess Caroline of Monaco (who is herself stunning), has beautiful children... Really, that entire family has incredible "looks" genes.
|
It pays to have the late Princess Grace of Monaco (formerly the actress Grace Kelly) as a grandma!
__________________
ASF
Causa latet vis est notissima - the cause is hidden, the results are well known.
Alpha Alpha (University of Oklahoma) Chapter, #814, 1984
|

03-18-2005, 11:45 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: $outh Beach
Posts: 4,231
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OohTeenyWahine
I remember as a kid we'd go on field trips to Iolani Palace -- former home of King David Kalakaua and Queen Lydia Lil`uokalani until the overthrow. I remember being in awe at the grandeur of the place. It was so big and beautiful.
I still get the same feeling after all these years.
|
Is the palace still there?
|

03-18-2005, 11:58 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: $outh Beach
Posts: 4,231
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DeltAlum
Why not? They still have remarkable influence, even after all of the tragedies that have touched them.
|
Well for starters there's not a whole lot of them left. And even fewer go on to public office these days. And even fewer stay out of a scandal. Ted Kennedy is an ancient relic from a world few people today can relate to. They relatively have no political influence anymore outside of Mass. Most people look at them like they're a joke.....like Ted Kennedy never really working a day in his life. It was different with Joe Kennedy and Joe Jr. and JFK and RFK. Those guys worked hard at what they did. But since them the family has declined. You could argue that John Kerry is a Kennedy and that he had influence. Well, thats true, but he didnt win the election and he will be forgotten in less than 10 years. And besides, look who was running against Kerry for the democratic nomination...Howard Dean??? C'mon. That guy is a bigger joke than Kerry. Fact is, the Kennedy family got its power quick and easy......and they lost it quick and easy. Its as simple as that.
|

03-18-2005, 12:21 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NJ/Philly suburbs
Posts: 7,172
|
|
HIS ROYAL HOTNESS! DAYUMN!
What she said! All 3 she mentioned are hella fine!
Who needs coffee when there is a HOT thread like this?
Drool!
Quote:
Originally posted by ms_gwyn
Felipe de Borbón y Grecia, Crown Prince of Spain
This man a beautiful...yummy......
Of course Prince William...i'm just so glad that Harry got cute, I was worried there for a while
|
__________________
"OP, you have 99 problems, but a sorority ain't one"-Alumiyum
|

03-18-2005, 01:22 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Huntsville, Alabama - ahem - Kwaj East!
Posts: 3,710
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OohTeenyWahine
I remember as a kid we'd go on field trips to Iolani Palace -- former home of King David Kalakaua and Queen Lydia Lil`uokalani until the overthrow. I remember being in awe at the grandeur of the place. It was so big and beautiful.
I still get the same feeling after all these years.
|
Until I read more about Hawaiian history and culture, all I knew about Iolani Palace is that it was the Hawaii Five-O headquarters (at least the exterior).
Damned shame that much of the furnishings of the palace were sold off to the highest bidder at the turn of the 20th century; I'm glad to see that much of it is finally coming back to their rightful home.
__________________
ASF
Causa latet vis est notissima - the cause is hidden, the results are well known.
Alpha Alpha (University of Oklahoma) Chapter, #814, 1984
|

03-18-2005, 02:23 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia and London
Posts: 1,025
|
|
With regard to the British monarchy it is actually a very good deal for the British people. When the Monarch dies his/her estate passes to the next Monarch, but, the new monarch assigns the crown estate to the British government to be administered. The civil list is what pays the Royals for performing their duties. The civil list is funded by the earnings of the crown estate. The earnings of the crown estate are very much larger than the funds paid into the civil list and what is left over goes to the government to the general fund. The monarch also inherits the previous monarch's PERSONAL estate and has for some years now paid regular income tax on that as well. So, the Royal holdings are used by the government to defray the expenses of the monarchy, the residue (worth millions of Pounds Sterling) go to the people through the general fund, and the personal income tax on personal holdings goes to the government's inland revenue dept. just like anyone else. The tourist value of the Royals is worth quite a lot and they actually cost nothing and contribute millions to the public purse. The anti-monarchists like to gloss over this rather interesting point.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|