|
Re: Re: still hard to grasp
I totally agree with AEPhiSierra.
I am from a small, under 30 chapter. We are not cost ineffective. We also have a house, but still are not a burden to our organization. Small groups have a lot to offer. I could not/would not have been part of a 200 person chapter. It just would not have been the right feel to me (I make that statement without having ever been part of an org that size, so who knows, maybe it is better than my image) Yes, National GLOs are a business. But size is not the only factor that is to be looked at.
Websites and surveys are a great idea. Maybe the adviors can get together and chat then get the execs to sit down and really talk face to face and work out the drama. There will always be some, but an open discussion with the two groups about the issues they face TOGETHER might help them overcome some of the pettiness.
|
Threaded Mode