Quote:
Originally posted by James
I was discussing with a group of friends the age ole question of how you know if you are good in bed. After all no one complains to your face so most of the feedback is good.
So we pondered it over a few beers and shots. It was a mixed group . . and this is what we decided:
For the guy, the obvious is true, he demonstrates skills when he is able to maintaina high state of arousal for a girl and give her orgasms. The better he is able to do that, especially in the face of someone that isn't basically a short fuse, the better skills he has.
Also the quicker and more intensely he can arouse the girl when she isn't already in the mood is a factor.
What we decided for the girl is counter intuitive. She demonstrates skills when she is able to maintain a high level of arousal in the boy but is able to delay and prolong his climax . . the longer she can keep him intensely aroused and engaged without climaxing is a tribute to her skills.
What I was curious about, is how many of you ladies thought of it this way prior to this post?
Or what you thought being "good in bed" meant?
|
that's interesting. i've never really sat there and thought, what constitues a person to be "good in bed."
quite honestly, until very recently i didn't care about the guy and what he thought - i just cared that i "got mine"... and with my last bf, i was so intent on him climaxing, that i forgot about me... so now i'm back to the, "i-don't-give-a-f***-as-long-as-i-get-mine" mentality... maybe i need to factor in both. hmmm...
Bet you havent froze since. 
Linear Mode
