I'm sorry. I am having a slow day. I still don't get it- I'm not saying you didn't articulate it- I am saying I didn't catch it.
If I put marriage on one hand and civil union on other and afford them, both the same legal rights and require businesses/organizations to equally recognize/protect both and both types of partners- where is the discrimination?
Other than the name, what is the disparate treatment?
Sidebar: I am posting this publicly just because I think its a good convo and by PMing I feel I'd take away from everyone being able to partake.
Hijack: I have always wondered, what does ETA mean?
I told you- it is a slow day.
Threaded Mode