So would they not be allowed to throw a party outside of the sorority? Can they have birthday parties or are they Jehova Witnesses?
Remember if you treat people like children or criminals, then they respond in the same way. But then again sororities have all sorts of silly rules that I can't begin to comprehend.
-Rudey
Quote:
Originally posted by DCDisney
Yes, this is a sorority. No chapter house, only a common area inside a dormitory floor. Parties took place at privately leased houses in a city, off-campus.
Sorority either attended a party, after organizing attendance, transportation, themed costumes or clothing, or they actually co-sponsored a party with a fraternity group.
"Approved" vs "unapproved" means the parties were not in compliance with the GLO's risk managment policies and procedures.
Parties were funded by "passing the hat". Official sorority funds were not used. It isn't an issue of spending money they shouldn't have, or writing checks out of the sorority account. They funded the party "underground" or passing the hat.
BTW .... nationals have been brough in over the past few years. I don't think the chapter members "fear" the nationals, but I also don't think they respect them either. They just tolerate their brief visit, and then go back to their partying.
Maybe taking individual membership action (suspending people, or "kicking them out") should happen. Would that be a deterrant to chapter members in the future ?
Yes... I'd love to hear from current collegians. Honestly, what do you think would help stop this ???
|
Threaded Mode