|
First of all, I hope that no one in MCGLOs takes it personally that we (not in MCGLOs) are discussing these options. I think it's moreso our concern for the health of any GLO in general and hoping that these members can have a sisterhood or brotherhood that exists in perpetuity. I know for me, it always makes me sad to see that an organization has folded due to low numbers, lack of interest, etc.
That said, I don't think bigger MCGLOs absorbing smaller ones (considering they meet requirements) is a bad thing. Nor do I think smaller orgs merging with each other is a bad thing.
I think many of them would have to overcome their founder-itis and look at the greater good.
And who knows....the ceremonies and traditions of the smaller orgs could still be used in some way, I'm sure.
|
Threaded Mode