Quote:
Originally posted by SoTrue1920:
You don't *care* whether someone is faithful to you? So.. if he cheats on you with a passel of women, that's somehow more acceptable to you than him saying "I am attracted to men, but I've decided not to act on that attraction in order to settle down with you"?
|
Allow me to clarify. Simply put I have high standards. A heterosexual man that cheats on me with a passel of women, or even one woman will get put to the curb like Thursday's trash. I expect EVERY man I date to be faithful to me. I also expect every man I date to be heterosexual. If I find out the man I am currently dating is bisexual, I'm not going to say "OK, well he HAS been faithful to me, he IS a good person. So I guess we can stay together". NOT! There are plenty of respectful, faithful, hetersosexual men out there and many of them can't be with me either. He must meet ALL of my qualifications. Bisexuality, is means for immediate and permanent dismissal. What is it that greeks say? "Just because you meet the minimum qualifications, doesn't guarantee you will be offered membership"? "Membership has its privileges"? "By nature, our organizations are discriminatory"? OK, I'm discriminatory too. Just because a man is faithful to me doesn't guarantee that we will stay together, bisexual or not.
Also, I found this interesting. A lesbian said on another sorority's board that she is only interested in lesbian women, no bisexuals. Noone even batted an eyelash. But when a heterosexual woman says she only wants a heterosexual man, no bisexuals, people automatically think HOMOPHOBE. Why is that?
[This message has been edited by MIDWESTDIVA (edited April 18, 2001).]
Threaded Mode