|
Here's the latest on the indecency story from today's Broadcast Engineering online:
News
Indecency gives way to spring break
"The U.S. Senate has delayed action on the broadcast indecency legislation at least until after its spring break. Majority leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) had wanted the vote last week, but key Democrats objected to a rushed vote on the controversial legislation that would impose stiff fines for certain broadcast content.
The U.S. House of Representatives, already on a two-week break, approved the legislation earlier. The House bill would give the FCC the authority to fine broadcasters as much as $500,000 per violation and apply large penalties against those on-air personalities who willfully violate the rules.
The Senate, however, may be caught up in a legislative gridlock that some fear could extend until after the November elections.
Both Republicans and Democrats blame each other for causing the legislative snarl by refusing to allow votes on measures they don’t like, but that have broad support in both chambers. Others cite growing friction between President Bush and members of Congress of both parties for the inaction.
In the meantime, the FCC proposed $495,000 in indecency fines against Clear Channel Communications for radio broadcasts by Howard Stern, prompting the nation’s largest radio chain to drop the country’s best-known shock jock."
Does the size of these fines and potential fines help explain why the owners are making the moves they're making?
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|
Hybrid Mode
