|
Let's take a hypothetical situation...
Let's say innocent bystanders who accidentically get shot and/or killed by gang shootings didn' even factor into the equation. Let's *pretend* that doesn't happen anywhere in the US (it's a HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION PEOPLE!) And when gangs shoot to killsomeone from a different gang - they always hit their target.
Would you be against gangs then? The drugs, poverty, other crimes that are often associated with gang areas are still a problem.
I guess what I'm asking is whether you value all lives equally. Or is an innocent bystander "worth more" so that's why we care about gang violence. Not because we're ethically opposed to one person taking the life of another, or gun use, etc...
|
Threaded Mode