Quote:
Originally posted by AKA2D '91
Question/Concern:
*coughnewmanagement, Kellycoughcough*
|
I don't know. I kinda have to disagree with this one simply because I don't believe that Kelly would have gotten this far had it not been for Destiny's Child and the management of Mathew Knowles. That and the fact that it's not the fault for Beyonce, Kelly or Mathew Knowles that a lot of people are so receptive and intrigued by Beyonce as opposed to Kelly (or Michelle). Think about it like this: Mathew Knowles is the manager of both Beyonce and Kelly (unless I'm mistaken). I'm sure that the man is smart enough to try to market them both equally hoping for the same success for both of them. Why? Because it will bring him more money. If Kelly's album does well...more money for him. If Kelly's movie career blows up...more money for him. Again, all he can do is put them out there. It's up to the media and the public to accept them and obviously right now everybody is loving Beyonce. And of coarse every parent who love and care for their child want to see him or her do well. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I think the majority of us will be the same way. And finally, if Kelly Rowland isn't having a problem with the way her career is being managed who are we to criticize? We aren't getting paid for it.
Hybrid Mode
