Let me apologize in advance if I am taking ktsnakes comments out of context.
It seems to me that he might be implying that it is a subjectively sensitive issue.
To the groups of people that liked the koi, that hate fraternities, that like drama, that love animals, and/or anthromorphasize (sp?) animals.
To them its really serious.
But does the sensitivity of those groups make this into an objectively larger issue?
In the grand scheme of things is this a large issue? Or a big deal even by implication?
Quote:
Originally posted by ktsnake
What other than a property crime makes this special? They killed a fish and ate it. Koi cost a few hundred dollars but they are pretty easily replaced.
I kind of wonder what a $300 fish tastes like.
I think people are blowing this way out of proportion.
|
Threaded Mode