|
I have a lot to say about this subject, as someone who goes to a small state school that isn’t that selective. Are y'all saying that people that go to schools like this aren’t as GOOD as people who go to better schools? I personally think that I am an as good, if not better contribution to my glo. I scored very high on my ACT, graduated top five in my high school class (in a class of 1200 graduates), was a class officer, and I think I would be just as marketable at any "better" school as I am right here where I am now. Just because a glo is composed of people who go to a school with a less developed academic (or other) reputation, does not mean that they do not have a great, great, great organization with great, great, great members. And just because these people go to these "lesser" schools in the first place, are they not good enough to have your precious organization on their campus? It seems to me that a glo is supposed to be about true sisterhood, brotherhood, and concern for their community and other service oriented concerns. And although we were all meant to be part of an organization that is selective (that is what makes us special), but I am pretty sure that most people's glos were meant to be about being part of an amazing group of people that care, not about being snobby and not allowing our organization to colonize at a less competitive school because the potential members aren't as good as those who go to an ivy league school. By WHAT standards are these groups potentially not as good???
|
Threaded Mode