|
I don't think it's so much that they are allowing certain types of child porn, but from my understanding of the article it was that if one person were to have in their possession a hand drawing that they created themselves that depicted children in some form of sexual act, there wasn't much anyone could do about it other than deem this person a sicko-which of course they would be. Now, if this person were to distribute this picture then it would be a criminal act. I'm not condoning it, just claryfying the article. You can control peoples thoughts, no matter how hard you try.
|
Threaded Mode