|
A lot of chapters are putting stiffer requirements on people who want to take littles - no debt, certain percentage of events attended, etc. The concept is good because theoretically women who are the most involved won’t blow off their littles and will set a good example. The downside is the occasional favortism you mentioned.
If that many women are ineligible to take littles, then the sorority/chapter should re-evaluate its requirements or reevaluate its members.
Another issue is that as with many things, the amount of $$ you spend is a factor. Some people go crazy showering their littles with gifts and if you look at that and can’t afford it, you might just say forget it. That’s when it’s time to be un-fun and standardize the gifts that are given. Again, if that many women are opting out of littles that twins IN THE SAME PLEDGE CLASS are a thing, something is wrong.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|
Threaded Mode
