Quote:
Originally Posted by als463
I'm not sure I would have resigned. First, I think it's admirable that you stuck to your principles and stood up for the victim. That proves your true character. Unfortunately, without going into specifics, which I respect you not doing and agree with your choice, I can see how the committee may have felt conflicted. Think about it. For all they knew, you were jealous of the success of the perpetrator. I recognize you were not but, can see how others may have assumed that. This is such a tough and unsettling situation but, I think you dealt with it in the best possible way. Hopefully you feel that way.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titchou
I don't know that I would have resigned either. Sounds like they need a voice of reason on the committee. But it is understandable that you would want to do so...and that they would go ahead and vote to give him the award. A real conundrum that's difficult to navigate.
|
I hear you both.
For me, staying on the committee means that I have to walk lock-step with them, and I do not. Now that I am not, I am absolved from having to support the winner.
I really wish I could share more details. I WILL say that what he was nominated for was not impressive on its own, or against the other winners this biennium. He just doesn't fit, and it's almost like somebody owed him a favor lol
I appreciate you taking the time to respond and helping me think through this.