» GC Stats |
Members: 330,887
Threads: 115,704
Posts: 2,207,338
|
Welcome to our newest member, amasonusasd8903 |
|
 |

07-07-2015, 01:04 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 938
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZTheta
Sadly, carnation, I am not floored. Too many experiences with special snowflakes (both adults AND young women) who blithely act w/o regard to rules. They're Special, you know.
IMO the ridiculously short, truncated four to six week new member programs (w/ the exception of Chi Omega, to my knowledge) are one of the factors. Have you sat in on any of those new member meetings, especially in the mega-sized new member classes? It's very illuminating.
Let these new members have a good 18 weeks to learn about the sorority, membership, finances, etc. And make their grades (oh, yeah, there's that). That's plenty of time to make a decision about initiating FOR LIFE MEMBERSHIP.
Still don't see any evidence-based rationale (or data) for shortening the new member period.
|
SO MUCH THIS! I hate the shortened NM period. As a former CAB member, I know that the new members did not really learn the history, did not really assimilate/learn the values, creed, songs and philanthropy background---did not know all or even most of the actives, nor did the actives know them when they were initiated. I do not understand the value of the extremely truncated pledging/new member period. I don't think it helps to produce dedicated and committed new members. At the time we were having first degree ceremony in my chapter, today's chapters are preparing to initiate. Hats off to Chi Omega for standing firm. If they can do it, why can't other groups?
|

07-07-2015, 01:49 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Big D
Posts: 3,019
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katmandu
SO MUCH THIS! I hate the shortened NM period. As a former CAB member, I know that the new members did not really learn the history, did not really assimilate/learn the values, creed, songs and philanthropy background---did not know all or even most of the actives, nor did the actives know them when they were initiated. I do not understand the value of the extremely truncated pledging/new member period. I don't think it helps to produce dedicated and committed new members. At the time we were having first degree ceremony in my chapter, today's chapters are preparing to initiate. Hats off to Chi Omega for standing firm. If they can do it, why can't other groups?
|
I completely agree with AZTheta and Katmandu. Unfortunately, I think a lot of universities were pressuring for this, too. I hate the fast initiation. I think it has harmed GLOs tremendously. It has has a huge impact on the bonds of sisterhood that we hold dear.
I am thankful that we are not moving to the policy of SAE, which has imposed initiation within what... 3-5 DAYS of accepting a bid?
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
JOINING
|
kenespurling |
Introductions |
0 |
12-21-2011 06:30 AM |
a new chi o joining :)
|
ChiOTilIDieO* |
Introductions |
2 |
10-27-2011 01:46 PM |
JOINING
|
BREE2010 |
Sorority Recruitment |
7 |
06-11-2008 05:23 PM |
Joining...
|
IllWill |
Omega Psi Phi |
0 |
02-22-2006 11:33 PM |
Joining?
|
Kyla |
Zeta Phi Beta |
4 |
07-17-2000 07:52 PM |
|