GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,167
Threads: 115,703
Posts: 2,207,379
Welcome to our newest member, zbryanmarley602
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old 10-18-2014, 08:28 AM
IUHoosiergirl88 IUHoosiergirl88 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw 1963 View Post
Then where are these animals getting these diseases from? I'm just trippin at why they can't just come up with a vaccine like they do for other illnesses.
Most of these viruses and bacteria have been around long before humans have been here and will be around long after humans leave. If you want some reading material to illustrate this: "Level 4 Virus Hunters of the CDC" is a great book.

Quote:
But it came over here from Africa, though. I think they should keep it under control here since about 3 people that we know of have it in the US. Then, from that point on, stop folks from going to those countries in Africa that harbor the virus, and vise versa. Because all that's going to happen is folks are going to keep bringing it up in here.

If healthcare workers want to go over to Africa and aid the victims, then they need to keep their asses there until a vaccine/cure is developed.
It came over here from Africa via Brussels, Belgium. If you ban travel from West African nations, those nations just aren't going to stamp passports--many nations do this now to obfuscate where their residents are actually coming from. If this happens, it looks like your patient zero came from Belgium, NOT West Africa. You've now made it harder to solve your problem of identifying people at risk. Now, everyone who came off an international flight displaying flu-like symptoms is an 'at risk' Ebola patient. You just took the risk pool from small to extremely large...and that's bad.


You keep throwing around a vaccine/cure like it's some easy thing to pull out of a hat. It's not--we have one possibly effective treatment (ZMAPP)--but that may prove in the long term to be no better than standard health practices. Ebola isn't a lucrative or high profile disease for pharmaceutical researchers, so developing a vaccine isn't high on their priority list. Ebola IS interesting for them because it is similar to a number of other related filoviruses, so if you knock out one you might be able to apply it to those other filoviruses...but maybe not.



The Ebola outbreak is a great opportunity for people to educate themselves on public health, science, and how things work in the pharmaceutical industry.
__________________
First. Finest. Forever. <>ALPHA DELTA PI <>
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.