Quote:
Originally Posted by agzg
But, in the case of the Redskins, they're not telling them what they should do. They're telling them that they're not going to protect them from trademark infringement.
In the case of the Clippers, of course the NBA has the right to tell the owner of the Clippers what to do. The owner of the clippers either has the choice to do what they say or disaffiliate from the NBA. Like... I can either do what my GLO tells me to do or what I should do, or they can kick me out. Same thing.
|
But, does the NBA really have the right to do that? We keep double-posting. Whoops! MC also explained the trademark infringement and I appreciate you doing it as well. It's one thing not to protect them. I guess it's another thing, like 33girl pointed out earlier, to pick and choose what is and is not offensive. It reminds me of how the NCAA does things. Some things are okay and get by while other things unrelated are sanctioned. <-- I'm sure you know where that last bitter remark comes from regarding the NCAA.
Threaded Mode
