Quote:
Originally Posted by maconmagnolia
I don't think that's fair. The jurors said that they wanted to convict Zimmerman of something, but under the law, they couldn't do so.
The state overcharged the case, could not back it up, and this is the natural end result. I think that if they originally would have charged Zimmerman with manslaughter and made their case that way, he would have been convicted. Unfortunately, that isn't what happened.
|
I disagree. How did "overcharging" (by this, I'm presuming you mean murder 2) prevent jurors from convicting on the lesser included charge of manslaughter?
I thought, as did many others, manslaughter was clearly proven. Given that it was a lesser included charge, it was certainly there for the jurors to consider.
Threaded Mode
