GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,973
Threads: 115,726
Posts: 2,208,039
Welcome to our newest member, alistexaxdoz715
» Online Users: 2,654
2 members and 2,652 guests
John, naraht
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2013, 07:32 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by thetalady View Post
MC, does this decision also mean that religious leaders of all faiths will be required to perform same sex marriages? Could they be prosecuted for discrimination if they refuse? or is that an issue coming later down the road?
Not remotely possible.

See the First Amendment Establishment and Free Exercise clauses.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:00 PM
PiKA2001 PiKA2001 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:22 PM
thetalady thetalady is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Big D
Posts: 3,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Not remotely possible.

See the First Amendment Establishment and Free Exercise clauses.
thanks for the info everybody! I appreciate it.

An interesting read that also helped, thanks to Mary Poppins

A 30 Second Guide to How the Gay Marriage Ruling Affects You

Last edited by thetalady; 06-26-2013 at 08:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:42 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Not remotely possible.

See the First Amendment Establishment and Free Exercise clauses.
This. Religious leaders/clergy aren't "required" to perform weddings now. They are authorized (or in some states, licensed) to perform weddings, and are fully able (as DGTess suggests) to refuse to perform a wedding if applicale religious requirements are not met.

What today's decision means is that if a state legally recognizes a marriage, the federal government cannot refuse to recognize it. So for example, if you're a legally-married same-sex couple in, say, New York, the IRS now has to let you file a joint tax return. But under the decisions today, it is still up to each state to decide whether to recognize same-sex marriages.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Court Ruling in Favor of George Mason U Administrators exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 0 05-14-2009 04:46 PM
CT Supreme Court legalizes same-sex marriage KSigkid News & Politics 2 10-10-2008 03:40 PM
Supreme Court to look at Florida Adoption case, May Evoke "Lawrence" Ruling IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 0 01-06-2005 12:54 AM
Supreme Court of Canada rules in favour of Same Sex Marriage bcdphie News & Politics 9 12-10-2004 10:46 AM
MA court ruling on gay marriage ban...your thoughts? LuaBlanca News & Politics 70 05-17-2004 02:44 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.