Cut from all Chapters at UGA

[AOII Angel]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

Actually Titchou brought up Alabama.

Please point out where her organization has been attacked. Stating that a recolonizing organization pledges girls who have been released from recruitment is not an attack.

Rather, it is some of you who are imposing a negative view on pledging these girls with your characterization of this as an "attack."

It has nothing to do with pledging women who may have been released from recruitment. It is about a pattern of bringing up DG specifically to slam Titchou. She never said that SECglitter or women who were released are not worthy of membership. You read that into her posts then threw her chapter's new colonization in her face and said, "betcha took a lot of women that got released from recruitment." What about this sequence of events was not a catty use of an innocent colony to get back at a GC member that you don't like? Seriously? You didn't post that with good intentions bc it was irrelevant to the situation at UGA. Quit pretending. We aren't dumb. We remember your prior ugly remarks about her chapter. There is a such thing as reading between the lines.

[Hartofsec]

Originally Posted by AOII Angel

It has nothing to do with pledging women who may have been released from recruitment. It is about a pattern of bringing up DG specifically to slam Titchou. She never said that SECglitter or women who were released are not worthy of membership. You read that into her posts then threw her chapter's new colonization in her face and said, "betcha took a lot of women that got released from recruitment." What about this sequence of events was not a catty use of an innocent colony to get back at a GC member that you don't like? Seriously? You didn't post that with good intentions bc it was irrelevant to the situation at UGA. Quit pretending. We aren't dumb. We remember your prior ugly remarks about her chapter. There is a such thing as reading between the lines.

Would be much appreciated if you quoted what I actually said instead.

If there is a vulnerable party on this thread, it is a young lady who is disappointed following her release from recruitment.

Not an organization. Not an alum.

[amIblue?]

Originally Posted by Hartofsec

If there is a vulnerable party on this thread, it is a young lady who is disappointed following her release from recruitment.

Not an organization. Not an alum.

Well, you're 100% right about that.

So why is it that you felt the need to bring up DG?