» GC Stats |
Members: 331,217
Threads: 115,703
Posts: 2,207,395
|
Welcome to our newest member, znthonyjuniorz1 |
|
 |

08-01-2012, 10:46 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 364
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Homosexuality and same-sex partnerships are by no means a "condition" but....
Would there be an (insert company) appreciation day and would the ACLU get involved if the (insert company) CEO said that her/his traditional religious views regarding the family support the notion that people with a diagnosed mental or physical condition should not be allowed to be married or have children?
Freedom of speech, indeed.
|
Again, like I said for me personally, it wasn't about the message at all. It was about a bunch of political goons telling a company that their company was not welcome in their fair burgs because their religious/political views differed from the powers that be there.
|

08-01-2012, 10:53 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greek_or_Geek?
Again, like I said for me personally, it wasn't about the message at all. It was about a bunch of political goons telling a company that their company was not welcome in their fair burgs because their religious/political views differed from the powers that be there.
|
I am not talking about personally. I asked about group dynamics of whether there would even be an appreciation day and the ACLU involved.
As for personally:
I still believe that almost everyone has a viewpoint that they absolutely cannot and will not tolerate, freedom of speech be damned, and if a person or company expouses such a viewpoint they would have no problem boycotting that company and having the company banned from the vicinity if possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
Given that the ACLU has defended the free speech rights of Neo-Nazis and the KKK, then yeah, I can imagine them getting involved if government officials suggested that a company should stay out of that official's city based on the speech of the company's CEO, regardless of what that speech was.
|
Thanks for reminding me about the ACLU.
Last edited by DrPhil; 08-01-2012 at 11:04 PM.
|

08-01-2012, 11:04 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
First, "Free Speech" as outlined in the First Amendment doesn't apply to this issue at all.
Second, you know who would probably love to freely express their love for their partners, shouting from the rooftops their commitment to each other through legal marriage, freely and in a manner protected from government interference?
Gay people.
|

08-01-2012, 11:13 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: but I am le tired...
Posts: 7,283
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
First, "Free Speech" as outlined in the First Amendment doesn't apply to this issue at all.
Second, you know who would probably love to freely express their love for their partners, shouting from the rooftops their commitment to each other through legal marriage, freely and in a manner protected from government interference?
Gay people.
|
Stop making me want to straight marry you. It's disgusting. Also Chick-fil-A will corporate person free speech me and try to get my marriage rights blocked.
|

08-01-2012, 11:07 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
I still believe that almost everyone has a viewpoint that they absolutely cannot and will not tolerate, freedom of speech be damned, and if a person or company expouses such a viewpoint they would have no problem boycotting that company and having the company banned from the vicinity.
|
As you alluded to earlier, freedom of speech does not mean that you can say whatever you want to without criticism (or boycotts of your business). It means that, absent something like endangering people (like shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater), the government cannot censor your speech or punish you for your speech.
People in a city signing a petition or letter to the company CEO saying we don't like your position and we don't want to see you come to our town = those people exercising their own free speech rights.
But the mayor of the city saying the same thing in his capacity as mayor (rather than his capacity as just another citizen) does get a bit too close to government censorship of speech.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|

08-01-2012, 11:15 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 703
|
|
In response to thetaj's question on how this event was Mike Huckabee-supported, Huckabee started this whole thing as a response to the boycott issue. Supposedly more than 20 million people looked at his Facebook page and people began to show support for the event even before it occured. Huckabee is quoted as saying that "the success of Chick-fil-A is a great American story that is being smeared by vicious hate speech and intolerant bigotry from the left." (newsmax)
Huckabee then suggested the Appreciation Day to support Don Cathy and the company.
|

08-01-2012, 11:19 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbino
Huckabee is quoted as saying that "the success of Chick-fil-A is a great American story that is being smeared by vicious hate speech and intolerant bigotry from the left." (newsmax)
|
This is so shitty brilliant I can barely deal ... any reasonable reading of any of most of those words (especially "hate" and "bigotry") renders it completely false, yet we're loading up buses to buy fast food chicken from inordinately wealthy people. Poor, poor straight white rich guys.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|