|
Devil's Advocate
Devil's advocate.
Consider this: The priest learned about her homosexuality and called on her privately not to received communion. The lady did not agree, doesn't agree, that the all forgiving God can condemned her for loving another person. Since denying communion is a very serious matter (it literally means excommunication, declaring you out of communion), and since most priest tend to trust the discernment of the person who wishes to receive communion, hoping that there is true repentance, and don't usually deny communion, she stands to receive communion anyways. What should the priest do?
The way he acted was wrong, but wouldn't her actions be wrong as well. She had been told, but since no priest had denied her the communion before, she did not expect for that to happen.
The are a lot of assumptions being made in many comments in his thread. The article doesn't say anything about what happened or if something happened before. What the priest did, showed lack of pastoral care. Yet, we don't have all the information. We could have a prideful homosexual who met a prideful priest, and it became a test of wills.
We don't know if this is what happened, but the story with which I started is true, although this other priest managed it differently (and the person did not receive communion nor the public reprimand).
===
On another matter, in the west, after the sexual revolution cool down, most sins dealing with sex have lost the guilt that came with them, most sexual acts have lost the sinful connotation. That is why most of the Church's teaching on sexuality are ignored, since the Church is believed to be wrong (I am not saying it is or that it is not, I'm just stating a fact.), and that is why they don't see anything wrong with receiving communion. Yet, looking at numbers, Catholics in the east and in Latin America, Africa, Asia, etc. do feel remorse for not following Church's teachings, and even though they still commit the acts, they don't stand up to receive communion. In some way, both are right. If I don't agree that is sin, I have no reason not to receive communion. If I agree that is sin, I do (although the Church's teachings are pretty clear about what is sin).
BTW, impure thoughts are not "She is hot" or "He is sexy." Impure thoughts are reducing the other person to an object and enjoying a mental fantasy with them.
Who can or should receive communion? In the West, society has made it not so clear.
__________________
ΣΛΒ - ΓΙΣ - ΔΣΠ
Fraternities
ΓΒΦ, BΓΣ, ΦKΦ, OΔK
Societies
|
Hybrid Mode
