GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,478
Threads: 115,707
Posts: 2,207,599
Welcome to our newest member, Charlesguess
» Online Users: 6,935
1 members and 6,934 guests
southernbuff
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:32 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
The vitriol directed at the President really seems unprecedented. During the Bush years, we were all just content to call Bush a dumbass. Now, it's in style to be seen being physically aggressive towards a sitting POTUS?
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:44 PM
knight_shadow knight_shadow is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
The vitriol directed at the President really seems unprecedented. During the Bush years, we were all just content to call Bush a dumbass. Now, it's in style to be seen being physically aggressive towards a sitting POTUS?
Forgive my (youthful) ignorance, but how recent of a phenomenon is the political pundit? I'm sure they have existed in one form or another for many years, but it seems that they've come out in full force recently (both sides of the aisle). I think our dependence on the internet has helped them spread like wildfires and I don't like it.

Oh, and the race thing too.
__________________
*does side bends and sit-ups*
*doesn't lose butt*

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2012, 12:56 AM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow View Post
Forgive my (youthful) ignorance, but how recent of a phenomenon is the political pundit? I'm sure they have existed in one form or another for many years, but it seems that they've come out in full force recently (both sides of the aisle). I think our dependence on the internet has helped them spread like wildfires and I don't like it.
Punditry has existed forever - I mean, depending on how you frame it, the Federalist Papers were pretty explicitly political commentary/punditry.

I think the difference is in the stances/angles/attitudes taken by those pundits. Compare somebody like old boy George Will with more current models ... and yes, I picked Will because he's boring as hell.

Quote:
Oh, and the race thing too.
Yeah ... I mean, there's one obvious difference in this Presidency, and while discourse may have deteriorated over time (there's an element of "communication changing" that muddies the subjective elements), it kind of fails Occam's Razor to assume the largest changes were coincidental to inauguration, by chance.

Last edited by KSig RC; 01-27-2012 at 01:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barak Obama...could he be the next President of the US? LionOfJudah Phi Beta Sigma 36 07-16-2008 11:30 PM
Why Obama Should Not Be the Next President of USA moe.ron News & Politics 57 02-24-2008 03:46 PM
Clinton or Obama for President Phrozen1ne Alpha Phi Alpha 29 07-24-2007 04:28 PM
Obama Running for President. Tom Earp News & Politics 112 02-13-2007 09:46 PM
What's the ideal background for President, Governor, or Senator? Dionysus News & Politics 9 11-26-2002 06:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.