Quote:
Originally Posted by carnation
And--the terminology I used, including "damaged", is frequently used in the adoption world. Not in places where the children can see it, of course, but in literature, research, and in frank talking in the adoption world. It is needed to convey the seriousness of what has happened to certain children, and "flossing it up" helps no one.
|
agzg nailed it, you said "Who knows what condition those children are in," as if you should have gotten a Carfax report.
And since those children will be able to find all that frank talk by about age 13 or so thanks to the internet, they're the ones who can provide further objection.
There's also a weird dichotomy in talking about people as objects in a thread that talks about embryos as people.
Hybrid Mode
