Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
I wouldn't say that. Maybe "conventional" campuses are placing more women through formal rush, but how many of those women initiate or stay active for all 4 years?
Sorority enrollment is up EVERYWHERE, deferred, non-deferred, private, public etc.
|
My point is that having deferred recruitment does NOT translate into more successful (if we judge success by pnms placed in chapters) recruitment than those who do not defer; in fact, the opposite seems to be the case. The op posited that because of her daughter's recruitment failure recruitment should go to a deferred model. I do not think that would have the result the op thinks it would.
As to retention, I don't think there is a big difference between deferred/non-deferred campuses but don't know where to access the data. I think I can confidently state that retention isn't a major problem at the SEC campuses I referenced - a problem, perhaps, but look at those chapter numbers.
Threaded Mode
