If there are other criteria for membership, why aren't dues just seen as an additional criteria instead of seen as "paying for friends/sisters/brothers."
I rarely advocate changing founding policies and what the founders wanted but this may be one place where the founders weren't forwardthinking. What made sense 10 years ago doesn't always make sense forever. That happens sometimes. I would normally not chime in on another GLO like that but this member came to GC for advice for some reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pearl14
I would like to clarify about the fundraising we do. We are ALWAYS truthful about where the money is going. When we fundraise for our philanthropy we say so, when we fundraise for ourselves we say so. We do A LOT of bake sales and raffles of electronics/baskets. We are always on the look out for places to hold car washes, garage sales, and other opportunitues. The people pay because they get something back.
It's a lot of hardwork, but we always feel like we've accomplished something when we finish. We have recently raised enough to cover our first insurance payment. It's a great relief and something to feel proud of. And we work together through it all, so it's another bonding experience.
|
There seems to be a sense of imbalance here. The real sweat should come from service to others. Always breaking a sweat to raise money for yourselves seems to outweigh breaking a sweat to raise money for and help others. That doesn't mean that you aren't helping others but there isn't but so much time and energy.
You should be happy that you are wherever you are. There are some campuses and communities where people would eventually stop donating after hearing that you all don't pay dues. I hope that never happens to you all.