Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Then I don't really blame Brohannon for that. LOL. If he was incorrect that non-Hispanic whites are the minority at 42%, the article should have called him out. They should have the stats dammit.
ETA: Ummm...LOL...what was Brohannon talking about. Even this blog alludes to the fact that no group surpassed non-Hispanic whites. http://blog.mysanantonio.com/texas-p...ord-plurality/ |
Wikipedia's demographics of Texas has a really weird breakdown of the stats including contrasting non-Hispanic whites(32%) with Hispanics of any race (37%) and at the same time identifying over 70% of the population as "white."
While 'Hispanic' confounds the data because it's an ethnicity, it doesn't make sense to consider race in some and not other categories and ethnicity in some and not others. In short, I'm still going with "plurality" and this guy being fail.
Threaded Mode
