Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
Are you saying non D-1 schools should just bag their football teams then? Believe it or not, there are non D-1 players who end up in the NFL (and coaches too).
I don't want to think about the alum support my D-2 school would lose if we got rid of the football team - it would make the athletic funding situation even worse.
|
Not seriously, no. Although plenty of schools do just fine without football teams and even play (brace for it) soccer. Men AND women. But we have a fundamentally flawed system that prioritizes the money making for the school over the benefit of the student-athletes. When people complain that guys teams get cut because football has SOOOO many slots, I'm not particularly sympathetic since too many people wouldn't care if football, basketball and baseball were the only sports around and who cares about women's sports in the first place. Title IX at least makes the cuts hurt everyone equally rather than just women.
And who gives a crap about the NFL? It's statistically irrelevant. So few people make it in the first place that Joe Schmoe coming from Division Two U doesn't exactly present a convincing case for prioritizing football above all.