Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille
I feel sorry for anyone who was so desperate they chose this doctor rather than seeking a reputable clinic. Babies are not punishment for being an addict. Botched abortions are not punishment either.
Most women who have an abortion at all aren't looking for your sympathy in the first place. It's not the abortion that society feels 'sorry' for here, it's the terrible conditions, the poverty, the desperation, the lack of supports and so on. Stop acting like the abortion is only the act of the irresponsible who are to be pitied if we deign to.
There should be a minimum standard of care. There is in fact a minimum standard of care. Why do you think that women went to this clinic rather than the planned parenthood in the same area? One woman cites the protesters, others their legal status, hiding it from family or trying to scrape up money and so on. If there was easy, universal access to healthcare NO ONE would voluntarily go to this sort of doctor. I'd argue that the women who saw him were overall not "voluntarily" going in the first place.
ETA: Ok, I've reread your comments again, and really I do no understand how you work in social services. I don't. I work with addicts, with convicted felons, I work with people who make really stupid decisions and deserve the consequences from those decisions, yet I still feel compassion. I have a client who will probably lose her son due to her crack addiction. When she gets money, she smokes it all. But when she doesn't have money all of her potential comes out. I'm probably going to have to send her back to prison or for lockdown treatment in lieu of our services, yet I still feel compassion. She is responsible for her actions, yet she still deserves adequate health care. Another client, equally addicted has a history of prostitution for drugs, yet again, it's not like the prostitution means she deserves STDs, rape, or no access to healthcare. She can't afford birth control, nor can she afford to require the 'johns' to use a condom if they decided not to. How can you NOT feel sympathy for that?
I understand sometimes when people with no contact with poor people, addicts, people with SMI, and so on just don't get it *coughKevincough* but when someone is, in theory, in the FIELD of social services and social work? Get out of the field, you're doing it wrong.
|
I love how because I disagree with you (or anyone who disagrees with you) I am automatically a horrible monster who should not be in the field. I'm glad that you feel the need to try and put me down because I disagree with you. I know you work with convicts-you've said it in EVERY post that deals with the poor, sick, irresponsible, etc. I get it. Good for you.
I stand behind my belief that addicts make poor choices. Does that mean they should be raped? No. You seem to feel bad for every single person that makes a poor decision and then you turn it into an entire thread about how YOU are a compassionate person and I (as well as others who don't agree with you-to include Kevin) am a horrible person in the wrong field. You don't go to work with me. You don't see how I interact with people. You have no idea of my abilities or for whom I have compassion. I find it ironic that you tell others not to judge yet, you have no problem judging me or anyone else who doesn't agree with you.
I agree with pretty much everything AlphaFrog has said and I don't really care if you like it or not. I know-I know, I'm going to get the "Shut the fuck up," speech from you and you will call me a monster because I don't share your views instead of recognizing that not everyone will agree with you.
To others who are pro-choice, that is fine. I have no ill-feelings towards you. I agree that we can disagree. I'm glad we have people who don't all think alike or the world would be very boring. As far as telling someone they shouldn't be working in the field they are in because they disagree with you-that is a little too far.
Threaded Mode
