Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille
If you find it condescending to have someone point out to you that the literal words you were saying were factually incorrect, then I'm so sorry you have to deal with the real world.
You retreated to sarcasm because you were wrong. You continued to defend yourself despite the fact that you were, factually, wrong. You tried passive aggressiveness and smiley faces and yet, people aren't confused and are still very aware that you were wrong. So stop trying to redirect the negative attention and actually admit your error and attempt to have a conversation on those grounds rather than on the imagined ground that you fabricated while reading DrPhil's posts.
Stop trying to make it about me, you're not even good at it.
|
Here are examples of you being condescending, rude, and possibly even a tad bitchy:
"Yes, I elaborated more fully in my post and provided her with basic reading comprehension homework."
"Aw, look at her trying to be all passive aggressive because she was wrong and couldn't admit it.
It's OK. You've been wrong since your first post in this thread and we don't really expect you to change now. Hope never dies, but cynical expectations do wound it fairly well. "
In your opinion I am "wrong", so you got touchy. I responded in kind. You and Dr. Phil occasionally tag team in threads and like to play "I am superior, hear me roar". I don't really give a shit. You think I'm "wrong" about some inconsequential thing, you say something snide, I respond. It's an old pattern, I don't see where I am "wrong", and mostly I don't see why any of this is so important. However I AM literally watching paint dry in between layers, so I've got nothing else to do but continue this asinine game. Here you are:
I'M WRONG, ACCORDING TO DROLEFILLE AND DR. PHIL. There is a statement of fact.
Threaded Mode
