Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille
No, the problem is that adding a party requires a ridiculous number of loopholes. I voted Whitney last time around with getting Greens on the ballot as part of my reasoning. People didn't not vote for him because they thought loony or environment (although the typo in Chicago probably didn't help) but because he was neither D nor R.
|
I see the most likely party being added would be the Libertarians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AOII Angel
You sound like my husband. He thinks Clinton got the most done when he didn't have the Congress behind him.
.
|
He did, but he was also willing to compromise. He proposed A when the Republicans wanted Z and both sides moved toward M. I would like to see more of this. The joke is, when he did that, people accused him of waffling. Compromise is what it should all be about. We are more polarized right now than I've seen in the few decades that I've been paying attention and honestly, I think that's what is hurting us. Everybody is so worried about not letting the other side win that nothing constructive gets done.
Threaded Mode
