Quote:
Originally Posted by christiangirl
I think plenty would if the firefighters saved the house, then billed them the entire cost of the rescue effort. That's what happens with insurance, right? You either pay this low fee or, if you refuse, you can gamble and end up paying it all. The couple wouldn't have lost everything, the fire department would recoup the money from them, and even more neighbors would probably pay the $75 instead of the bajillion they see these two paying back.
|
Under what obligation would the homeowner have to repay the fire department?
Now you're requiring the firefighters to get a binding legal consent that the dude will pay whatever it costs to put out the fire, in addition to whatever else is going on? Seriously.
Also, why not just allow them to gamble, oh, in the way it currently allows? You pay the $75 or gamble the fire?
I think you're not even close to how this would (or should) really work.
Hybrid Mode
